IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mile] [IANA #921487] Protocol Action: 'The Incident Object Description Exchange Format v2' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-25.txt)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-approval@iana.org> Wed, 17 August 2016 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id DA6E912B039; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE59012B04F for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tJlFeVWuwZIW for <xfilter-draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B9512B039 for <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp02.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4522AE33E7 for <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0BE40C20550; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-approval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160803150200.6140.54785.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-921487@icann.org> <20160803150200.6140.54785.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-15788-1471460942-1043.921487-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #921487
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:09:03 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: rdd@cert.org, ncamwing@cisco.com, takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp, david.waltermire@nist.gov, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, mile-chairs@tools.ietf.org, mile@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20160817190908.DA6E912B039@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:09:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/qfLgiDCJzYNuenvJBFiD40Bbjdw>
Cc: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis.all@ietf.org
Subject: [mile] [IANA #921487] Protocol Action: 'The Incident Object Description Exchange Format v2' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-25.txt)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:09:09 -0000

Dear Roman,

The actions for this document are complete. The designated expert for the XML registries, however, has comments:

"It looks good. Two nits:

schemaLocation attributes are a bad idea
the definition of TimeZone allows for seconds, which is unnecessary (I think)"

If you want to make changes during AUTH48, the RFC Editor will contact us and tell us which updates to make. Alternatively, if you want to make changes now, just let us know.

Please review the actions below and let us know whether we've completed them correctly. When we receive your confirmation, we'll tell the RFC Editor the IANA actions are complete.

ACTION 1:

IANA has added the following entry to the IETF XML ns registry:

iodef-2.0	
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:iodef-2.0	
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/ns/iodef-2.0.txt	
[RFC-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-25]  

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry


ACTION 2:

IANA has added the following entry to the IESG XML schema registry:

iodef-2.0	
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:iodef-2.0	
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/iodef-2.0.xsd	
[RFC-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-25]

Please see
http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry


ACTION 3:

IANA has created 34 registries under the "Incident Object Description Exchange Format v2 (IODEF)" heading at 

http://www.iana.org/assignments/iodef2


Can we tell the RFC Editor these are complete?

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
IANA Lead Specialist
ICANN

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email