[Mip4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5454 (1718)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 15 March 2009 18:27 UTC
Return-Path: <web-usrn@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADE028C0E5 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.350, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fR0yfAUIBflr for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E03128C0CE for <mip4@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2FIRWOB013128 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from web-usrn@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n2FIRUD5013127; Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:27:30 -0700
Message-Id: <200903151827.n2FIRUD5013127@boreas.isi.edu>
To: tsirtsis@googlemail.com, vpark@qualcomm.com, hesham@elevatemobile.com, rdroms@cisco.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, townsley@cisco.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, pete.mccann@motorola.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: web-usrn@boreas.isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:35:33 -0700
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, mip4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Mip4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5454 (1718)
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:27:25 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5454, "Dual-Stack Mobile IPv4". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5454&eid=1718 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 2.1, pg.5 Original Text ------------- Prefix Length A sixteen-byte field containing the Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix; all insignificant (low-order) bits (beyond the Prefix Length) MUST be set to 0 by the originator of the option and ignored by the receiver. Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix A sixteen-byte field containing the Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix Corrected Text -------------- Prefix Length | Indicates the prefix length of the prefix included in the Mobile | IPv6 Network Prefix field. A value of 255 indicates that a link- | local address is included in the Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix field. Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix | A sixteen-byte field containing the Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix; | all insignificant (low-order) bits (beyond the Prefix Length) MUST | be set to 0 by the originator of the option and ignored by the | receiver. Notes ----- The replacement text apparently has been placed into the wrong field explanation. The text presented for "Prefix Length" is the text that should be specified for "Mobile IPv6 Network Prefix"; the correct text for "Prefix Length" (as shown above) is borrowed from Section 2.2. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5454 (draft-ietf-mip4-dsmipv4-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Dual-Stack Mobile IPv4 Publication Date : March 2009 Author(s) : G. Tsirtsis, V. Park, H. Soliman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Mobility for IPv4 Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Mip4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5454 (1718) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Mip4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5454 (1… George Tsirtsis