Re: [Mip4] [issue25] AAA-NAI extension sub-types for non-AAA NAIs

Henrik -

I agree that we want to keep it extensible. I am okay with the statement
that other types of NAI can be defined in the sub-type field in future.

-a

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

>This has been entered in the issue tracker as issue 25.
>
>owner: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>:
>
>category: Technical
>draft: draft-ietf-mobileip-aaa-nai
>priority: Should fix
>status: No discussion
>title: AAA-NAI extension sub-types for non-AAA NAIs
>
>The draft-ietf-mip4-aaa-nai-00.txt has been submitted to, and
>discussed by, the IESG, which had a few comments. These comments should
>be handled in the intermediate draft version -01.a available here:
>
> http://www.mip4.org/drafts/aaa-nai/
>
>One comment has also been made on the list on this draft, which is
>that it would be better to define a generalized NAI extension, rather
>than this AAA nai extension.
>
>In view of how far the draft has advanced, and the fact that the AAA
>NAI extension is referred to in the diameter mip4 application draft
>(draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-mobileip-15.txt), so any larger delay are
>rather bad, I propose to resolve this issue as follows:
>
>
>Add to IANA Considerations section:
>
>  The content and format for this extension is not specific to AAA NAIs,
>  so if in the future new NAIs are defined which does not strictly fall 
>  within the category of AAA NAIs, they may nevertheless be accomodated 
>  within the subtype numbering space defined for the AAA NAI Extension 
>  defined in this document.
>_________________________________________________
>Mip4 issue tracker <tracker-mip4@levkowetz.com>
><http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip4/issue25>
>_________________________________________________
>
>  
>

-- 
Mip4 mailing list
Mip4@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4