Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (4133)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Tue, 21 October 2014 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EF61A1BC9 for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMBAkAe6Z4Ug for <mip4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B181A1BB4 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7E880ED; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F148771B0001; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54465EA9.6080600@innovationslab.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:24:57 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, charliep@computer.org, ted.lemon@nominum.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, mccap@petoni.org
References: <20141017130258.E925E181C85@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141017130258.E925E181C85@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x9uiEDP1TiivvhcCWoumAvn9pAAx0T58M"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mip4/J37dqSeNbk6OIgEOYck3u86yHYA
Cc: mip4@ietf.org, jack.martin@spirent.com
Subject: Re: [Mip4] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5944 (4133)
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4/>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:25:14 -0000

All,

On 10/17/14 9:02 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5944,
> "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5944&eid=4133
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Jack Martin <jack.martin@spirent.com>
> 
> Section: 1.10
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> This format is applicable for non-skippable extensions that carry
> information of more that 256 bytes.
> .
> .
> .
> Since the Length field is 16 bits wide, the extension data can exceed
> 256 bytes in length.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> This format is applicable for non-skippable extensions that carry
> information of more that 255 bytes.
> .
> .
> .
> Since the Length field is 16 bits wide, the extension data can exceed
> 255 bytes in length.

Henrik noted that the correct value here should be 254 (as noted in the
follow-on erratum).

I will correct the correction and mark this as Verified.

Regards,
Brian