Re: [Mip4] Document Status Update

Sami Vaarala wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What is the status of MIP/VPN interactions on the new charter,
> specifically draft-ietf-mip4-vpn-problem-solution?  I thought
> it was under review but I don't see it on the document list
> below.

IMO, it should be standardized ASAP. I think it is ready to go.
(Sami, I am still reviewing the document).

Vijay

> 
> Best,
> 
> -Sami
> 
> Pete McCann wrote:
> 
>>Note there will be a very short amount of time between the October
>>13th IESG meeting (IESG hopefully will approve our new charter) and
>>the October 17th -00 draft cut-off.  Authors of drafts relevant to the
>>new work items, please be ready to submit appropriate mip4-named
>>version -00 drafts in this window.
>>
>>-Pete
>>
>>
>>Pete McCann writes:
>> > 
>> > With the rechartering effort almost completed (the charter is on the
>> > agenda for the October 13 IESG meeting), we thought it was a good time
>> > to update everyone on the status of our documents.  This helps
>> > everyone understand the work that remains to be done.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-11.txt
>> > Just re-submitted by Karim, ready to go to RFC Editor
>> > 
>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip4-rfc3012bis-04.txt
>> > Need to decide whether to fork off the Generalized Mobile IP
>> > Authentication Extension as a separate draft.
>> > 
>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip4-dynamic-assignment-05.txt
>> > Waiting on Kent to update nits.
>> > 
>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip4-faerr-02.txt
>> > Still in IETF Last call.
>> > 
>> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mip4-reg-tunnel-00.txt
>> > Need to decide whether to include the appendix or not.
>> > 
>> > >From our new milestones:
>> > 
>> > Dec 05 	Revised MIB for MIPv4 to IESG
>> > Review done, revision in progress.
>> > 
>> > Sep 05 	Revised MIPv4 specification to IESG for Draft Standard
>> > Draft for 3344bis has expired.  Update needed based on latest consensus.
>> > 
>> > Dec 05 	Revised rfc2794bis (NAI extension specification) to the IESG
>> > No draft yet.
>> > 
>> > Jan 06 	MIPv4 Mobike interaction BCP to the IESG
>> > draft-devarapalli-mip4-mobike-connectivity-00.txt is relevant.
>> > 
>> > Feb 06 	Generic Strings for MIPv4 to the IESG
>> > draft-sastry-mip4-string-extension-01.txt is relevant.
>> > 
>> > Mar 06 	RADIUS Extensions for MIPv4 to the RADEXT WG for comment
>> > draft-nakhjiri-radius-mip4-01.txt is relevant.
>> > 
>> > Mar 06 	FMIPv4 to the IESG
>> > draft-koodli-fmipv4-00.txt has expired.
>> > 
>> > Jun 06 	RADIUS Extensions for MIPv4 to the IESG
>> > See above.
>> > 
>> > Aug 06 	MIPv4 Extension for Configuration Options to the IESG
>> > draft-bharatia-mip4-gen-ext-00.txt is relevant.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/