[Mip4] Recharter: Ethernet Service Support

"McCann Peter-A001034" <pete.mccann@motorola.com> Tue, 05 May 2009 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992B828C16E for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LgvkpaaDiQO5 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com (mail128.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F7928C281 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: pete.mccann@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1241538595!10237820!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [136.182.1.14]
Received: (qmail 14785 invoked from network); 5 May 2009 15:49:56 -0000
Received: from motgate4.mot.com (HELO motgate4.mot.com) (136.182.1.14) by server-2.tower-128.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 May 2009 15:49:56 -0000
Received: from il27exr04.cig.mot.com (il27exr04.mot.com [10.17.196.73]) by motgate4.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n45Fntfj002342 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 08:49:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il27vts01 (il27vts01.cig.mot.com [10.17.196.85]) by il27exr04.cig.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id n45FntDB027046 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:49:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm67.ds.mot.com (de01exm67.am.mot.com [10.176.8.18]) by il27exr04.cig.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n45Fnss4027030 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2009 10:49:55 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 11:49:27 -0400
Message-ID: <BE4B07D4197BF34EB3B753DD34EBCD13039BEE88@de01exm67.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Recharter: Ethernet Service Support
Thread-Index: AcnNmRH7OKJDFCkjRGil4lbiFFG7wQ==
From: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
To: mip4@ietf.org
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Subject: [Mip4] Recharter: Ethernet Service Support
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip4>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:48:39 -0000

Hi, all,

During our meeting at IETF74, we discussed whether to take on
a draft describing support for Ethernet service to a mobile node,
as described in this draft:

draft-wu-mip4-ether-00.txt

The sense of the room seemed to be that we NOT take on this 
as a work item at this time.

This message is a request to confirm/reject this approach.  Please
respond to this e-mail with an indication of whether you agree
or disagree, and state your reasons why.

-Pete