Re: [MEXT] next steps with draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-04

[RYUJI WAKIKAWA <[e-mail]>]

Hi Marcelo,


On 2007/12/10, at 4:44, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the deadline for this document is
> Dec 2007    Submit Multiple CoA Registration to IESG
>
> so we really need to work these things out fast
>
> At the mext meeting draft-ietf-monami6-multiplecoa-04 was discussed
>
> There were a set of issues presented and the following was the  
> feeling of the room.
>
> - With respect for DSMIP support, people felt that this was to be  
> supported.
> The next steps for this are: if people in the ml feel otherwise,  
> please speak up in the next couple of days, if not we assume that  
> the consensus of the meeting holds
> The editor will address this issue for the next revision of the  
> document

OK.

> - With respect to bulk registration at the CN, the feeling of the  
> room was that we don't need to address this issue. Again, if someone  
> feels different speak up in a couple of days, or we will assume that  
> the consensus in the room holds
>
> - with respect to the threat described in draft-lim-mext-multiple- 
> coa-verify-00, the feeling of the room was that we need to take this  
> into account, so we need to address this threat. Again, if someone  
> feel otherwise, please speak up in a couple of days. To proceed with  
> these, we request the authors or other parties to provide text for  
> the draft and propose it to the ML
>
> - With respect to the case of multihoming with a visited network and  
> the home network, there was no clear consesus on the meeting but it  
> seemed that there was more support for supporting this case. I have  
> reached the same conclusion after reading the mailing list. So the  
> next steps for this are that the author or other partis to provide  
> text for this and propose it to the ml.

I will provide texts for above two at this weekend or the beginning of  
next week.

thanks
ryuji

> I would request people and in particular the auhtor to provide text  
> in about one week time, since our deadline is approaching really  
> fast and we should be able to deal with these last issues fast, so  
> we can issue a new short WGLC as with the other docuemnts.
>
> Regards, marcelo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext