[Mip6] Consensus Call: Standardizing the auth protocol [I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt]

Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Wed, 06 October 2004 22:21 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24640 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:21:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFKJW-0007bl-G5 for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:31:15 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CFK4i-0007Lz-52; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:15:56 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CFJtZ-0000QP-Vj for mip6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:04:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21600 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 18:04:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com ([131.228.20.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFK38-0006FF-N5 for mip6@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:14:20 -0400
Received: from esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (esdks002.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.121]) by mgw-x1.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i96M4Mh01097 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:04:22 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:04:11 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.31 2004060815 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i96M4BYT003345 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:04:11 +0300
Received: from mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.97) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com 00ACWPej; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:04:09 EEST
Received: from daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (daebh001.americas.nokia.com [10.241.35.121]) by mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i96M48S27226 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:04:09 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from daebe007.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.107]) by daebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:02:56 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:02:55 -0500
Message-ID: <697DAA22C5004B4596E033803A7CEF4403B1BF01@daebe007.americas.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Consensus Call: Standardizing the auth protocol [I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt]
Thread-Index: AcSr8DqS6Ympo/12TUmUacaxgh/VgA==
To: mip6@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2004 22:02:56.0154 (UTC) FILETIME=[3C1227A0:01C4ABF0]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Mip6] Consensus Call: Standardizing the auth protocol [I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is a consensus call to the WG on the issue of standardizing the
authentication-data-suboption mechanism for performing a binding between the
MN and HA. The issue has been discussed on the WG mailing list over
the last few weeks. The I-D
(draft-patil-mip6-whyauthdataoption-00.txt) has captured some of the
arguments, but there are several others that have been made on the
list as well. A summary of the discussion was sent out earlier and is
captured in :
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip6/current/msg01690.html

The proposal here (in brief) is to standardize a mechanism specified
in I-D draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt for performing MIP6
registration with a home agent. RFC3775 specifies the use of IPsec to
secure the binding update/ACK messages between the MN and HA. The
auth-protocol mechanism relies on the use of an
authentication-data-suboption and does not require the MN-HA to
establish an IPsec SA.  
(For the discussion that has ensued so far, please refer to the MIP6
ML archives)

The question to the WG is:

1. Should we standardize the authentication protocol specified in I-D
   draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol-00.txt as an alternative (to the
   IPSec mechanism specified in RFC3775/6) means to securing the BUs
   and BAcks between the MN and HA. Note that this solution is an
   additional mechanism for doing registration with an HA and does not
   deprecate the currently specified solution. 

   Yes	     [ ]
   No	     [ ]


The consensus call will close on October 12th, 2004.

-Chairs

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6