RE: [Mip6] Comments on draft-ietf-mip6-mn-ident-option-00.txt
john.loughney@nokia.com Sun, 19 December 2004 07:36 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA09970 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:36:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cfvl0-0006kN-Lb for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:45:34 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cfvai-0000YX-H1; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:34:56 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cfva7-0000S8-QQ for mip6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:34:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA09831 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:34:18 -0500 (EST)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from mgw-x4.nokia.com ([131.228.20.27]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cfvj8-0006iq-3c for mip6@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:43:38 -0500
Received: from esdks003.ntc.nokia.com (esdks003.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.158]) by mgw-x4.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id iBJ7YDK17548; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:34:14 +0200 (EET)
X-Scanned: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:33:39 +0200 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.31 2004060815 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks003.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id iBJ7Xddk011939; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:33:39 +0200
Received: from mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.97) by esdks003.ntc.nokia.com 00NPyZBb; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:33:38 EET
Received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.28]) by mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id iBJ7Xb303370; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:33:37 +0200 (EET)
Received: from esebe001.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.30]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:32:32 +0200
Received: from esebe056.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.51]) by esebe001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:32:30 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Mip6] Comments on draft-ietf-mip6-mn-ident-option-00.txt
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:32:30 +0200
Message-ID: <3CF661B1787ABF41A869BE20108F8D6D43250E@esebe056.ntc.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Mip6] Comments on draft-ietf-mip6-mn-ident-option-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcTlO0uIQKrJBixNR263UP1QVeUxnQAYXEwQ
To: jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi, mip6@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Dec 2004 07:32:30.0636 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5CE06C0:01C4E59C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jari, > Substantial: > > > [RFC2486] Aboba, B. and M. Beadles, "The Network Access > Identifier", RFC 2486, January 1999. > > It may be appropriate to refer to draft-ietf-radext-rfc2486bis-03.txt > instead. This document is in IETF LC at the moment, which means that > its in front of the ident-option draft; reference delay should not > be a problem. One good reason for switching to the bis reference > is that the ABNF in the original RFC had a number of problems. I agree with this. rfc2486bis should be an RFC before long, and it does correct a number of problems in the original RFC. John _______________________________________________ Mip6 mailing list Mip6@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6