Re: [Mip6] Review of draft-ietf-mip6-firewalls-00.txt (with referenceto draft-chen-mip6-gprs-02.txt)

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Mon, 25 October 2004 15:42 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05659 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:42:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM7Ck-0000de-FR for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:56:21 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CM6uq-0003dx-92; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:37:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CM6rC-0003PP-EP for mip6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:34:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04866 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM74f-0000U6-Ps for mip6@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:47:58 -0400
Message-ID: <007001c4baa8$2cbc8180$656115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, mip6@ietf.org
References: <697DAA22C5004B4596E033803A7CEF4403B1C03B@daebe007.americas.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Mip6] Review of draft-ietf-mip6-firewalls-00.txt (with referenceto draft-chen-mip6-gprs-02.txt)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:34:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Raj,

>> I believe this draft is in last call at the moment. It seems
>> to have been a
>> "stealth" WG draft, since it was never listed on the WG Web page until
>> recently. I also personally cannot recall having seen a
>> concensus call on
>> the mailing list to make it a WG draft, but perhaps that
>> might be due to a
>> lapse of memory on my part or an over-eager spam filter on my
>> laptop's.
>
>There is no "conspiracy theory" here. There was a problem with the
>IETF MIP6 WG Web page. It took a while for the web-admin of the page
>to get the draft listed. The ID has been listed as a WG ID in the
>repository for quite a while now.

Who said anything about a conspiracy theory? As I said, my memory or spam
filter may have been at fault. I was just noting that it is quite unusual
for a draft to go into Last Call when it isn't listed on the WG web page. In
fact, I can't remember that ever having occured for another WG.

            jak




_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6