Re: [Mip6] HAHA and HA reliability

Hi,

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:10:59 -0700
Vijay Devarapalli <vijayd@iprg.nokia.com> wrote:

> hi folks,
> 
> since we are on the topic of HA reliability, we recently revised
> and submitted a draft on HA reliability based on the HAHA
> protocol. you can find it at
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-devarapalli-mip6-nemo-local-haha-00.txt
> It has been completely re-written. it also has a section on using
> VRRPv6 with HAHA. comments are welcome.
> 
> HAHA in general supports placing HAs in geographically separate
> locations while still serving the same home prefix. this is
> described in
> http://www.mobilenetworks.org/nemo/drafts/draft-thubert-nemo-global-haha-00.txt
>
> the HAHA messages are defined in
> http://www.mobilenetworks.org/nemo/drafts/draft-wakikawa-mip6-nemo-haha-spec-00.txt

In the case where HA are placed in geographically separate locations,
this is indeed a multihoming configuration as defined in
draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement (for host mobility)
and draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues (for network mobility). 

As such, and since it covers for MIP6 and NEMO,  I think it falls into
the scope of the Monami6 BOF (http://www.nautilus6.org/ietf). However,
we have not yet initiated the discussion on this topic on the Monami6 ML
and it may be too much discussion for the BOF. If Monami6 can
become a WG, I think it should be added in our charter as a Monami6 WG
item.

Thierry

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6