[Mip6] Local HA Assignment issue
"Junghoon Jee" <jhjee@etri.re.kr> Thu, 11 November 2004 22:05 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA03967 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:05:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSN5u-0006en-6o for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:07:06 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CSMpF-00023P-Ei; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:49:53 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CSMmm-0000gn-76 for mip6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:47:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA02207 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:47:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cms1.etri.re.kr ([129.254.16.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSMo0-0006CT-4M for mip6@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:48:37 -0500
Received: from ETRIYSLEE (130.129.135.101 [130.129.135.101]) by cms1.etri.re.kr with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id VRHJAQC8; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 06:46:10 +0900
Message-ID: <002001c4c837$de948b90$65878182@ETRIYSLEE>
From: Junghoon Jee <jhjee@etri.re.kr>
To: mip6@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:44:27 -0500
Organization: CMS
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Subject: [Mip6] Local HA Assignment issue
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Junghoon Jee <jhjee@etri.re.kr>
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0727316306=="
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
I would like to know whether the local HA assignment function should be
included to the MIP6 WG's bootstrapping solution or not.
draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrap-ps-01.txt
Section 5.1.2 Dynamic Home Agent Assignment
[Page 10]
Local home agents
The mobile node's home ASP may want to allow a local roaming
partner ASP to assign a local home agent for the mobile node.
This is useful both from the point of view of communications
efficiency, and has also been mentioned as one approach to support
location privacy.
=> What is the exact meaning of the 'useful' and 'also been mentioned' ?
Is the local home agent function optional[MAY] ?
draft-le-aaa-mipv6-requirements-03.txt
Section 5.5. Home agent allocation
Such functionality SHOULD also be considered when designing the AAA
support for MIPv6 solution.
=> It seems that we SHOULD support the local HA assignment function.
I already know that draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrap-ps is not a I-D that describe the requirement &
draft-le-aaa-mipv6-requirements was expired.
But i think that we have to decide about this because many different approaches can be come out
depending on our decision.
Junghoon
_______________________________________________ Mip6 mailing list Mip6@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
- [Mip6] Local HA Assignment issue Junghoon Jee