Re: [Mipshop] FW: [Dime] Rechartering: draft-stupar-dime-mos-options

Hi Hannes,

draft-ietf-mipshop-mstp-solution-05, which is with the IESG currently,
has a dependency on this document. The extensions specified in
draft-stupar-dime-mos-options are required for delivering the MIH server
information to the NAS/access router.

However, in the AD review, a question was raised on whether we need this
scenario at all. We are currently discussing this. We should be able to
decide on this in the next couple of weeks. I will get back to you.

If we decide to keep this scenario in
draft-ietf-mipshop-mstp-solution-05, then I would like to see
draft-stupar-dime-mos-options adopted as a DIME WG document.

Vijay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:mipshop-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tschofenig, 
> Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:24 AM
> To: mipshop@ietf.org
> Cc: ext David Frascone
> Subject: [Mipshop] FW: [Dime] Rechartering: 
> draft-stupar-dime-mos-options
> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> In the DIME working group we are currently having a re-chartering
> discussion and one document that has been submitted to DIME relates to
> functionality that was developed in your working group. 
> 
> We would therefore like to understand whether 
> * there is an interest from the MIPSHOP WG to have DIME to 
> work on this
> subject
> * there are folks in MIPSHOP willing todo reviews and thereby help to
> finish the work quickly. 
> 
> We need your feedback!
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes & Dave
> DIME Chairs 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> >Behalf Of ext Hannes Tschofenig
> >Sent: 15 July, 2008 21:30
> >To: dime@ietf.org
> >Cc: Patrick Stupar; subir@research.telcordia.com
> >Subject: [Dime] Rechartering: draft-stupar-dime-mos-options
> >
> >Document: 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stupar-dime-mos-options-00.txt
> >
> >* Who is able to be editor of the document?
> >
> >* Who is interested to help the editor with the work on the 
> >draft by co-authoring it?
> >
> >* Who is able to provide reviews?
> >
> >* Who is unable to actively help with a specific document but 
> >supports the work?
> >
> >* Are there concerns regarding this document?
> >
> >* Is there a dependency with another IETF working group or 
> >with another SDO?
> >
> >* How long will it take to finish this document?
> >(A rough guess based on the current status of the document. By 
> >"finished" I mean "ready for WGLC".)
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >DiME mailing list
> >DiME@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Mipshop mailing list
> Mipshop@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
> 
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop