IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mipshop] MAP discovery (was Re: AD review of mipshop-4140bis)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 28 February 2008 11:46 UTC

Return-Path: <mipshop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-mipshop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mipshop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345E53A6CD3; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WtM9Q5vbZyqV; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BEC3A6A40; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mipshop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mipshop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FF428C377 for <mipshop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S73tmwwiSAk8 for <mipshop@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE073A6A40 for <mipshop@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52E3198D86; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:45:44 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993B1198D83; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:45:44 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <47C69ED0.7000001@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:45:20 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hesham Soliman <Hesham@elevatemobile.com>
References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAZgswlBrljUKcZNe3mbTCm8KAAAAQAAAAKm4AZfDe/UmP6IvA/BjbuwEAAAAA@elevatemobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAZgswlBrljUKcZNe3mbTCm8KAAAAQAAAAKm4AZfDe/UmP6IvA/BjbuwEAAAAA@elevatemobile.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: 'Mipshop' <mipshop@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mipshop-4140bis@tools.ietf.org, 'Vijay Devarapalli' <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com>
Subject: Re: [Mipshop] MAP discovery (was Re: AD review of mipshop-4140bis)
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <mipshop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org

OK

Jari

Hesham Soliman kirjoitti:
> Jari, 
>
> The next version will be submitted after IETF week, I couldn't get to this
> before IETF.  
>
>  > First, where's the new version of the draft that was promised? The
>  > deadline has passed and I don't see a new draft... if we 
>  > want this done,
>  > we need to address the AD review comments.
>  > 
>  > Second, regarding your proposal Vijay: are you suggesting a separate
>  > document, or something in this document? I think we could debate DHCP
>  > vs. RA topic, but in my mind that's a detail. The big 
>  > problem I had was
>  > using RAs to construct a flooding scheme throughout the 
>  > router network.
>  > I do not think that is appropriate, but local distribution 
>  > via RAs might be.
>
> => Yes and as we agreed the flooding part will be removed. regardless of the
> AR configuration mechanism, the spec keeps the RA between the AR and MN. 
>
> Hesham
>
>  > 
>  > Jari
>  > 
>  > 
>
>
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email