[MLS] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mls-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mls-architecture-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mls-architecture/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-mls-architecture-11
CC @evyncke

Thank you for the work put into this document, even if it took one year to
clear the previous discuss points: what matters is the end goal.

The revised -11 has addressed my second DISCUSS point of my previous ballot and
the latest -12 revision has addressed the first one:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/klr27xnbsivP060m8cwmDZV2xA8/

Thanks to Tatuya Jinmei, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request),
please consider this int-dir review with one nit worth considering:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mls-architecture-10-intdir-telechat-jinmei-2023-01-29/
and as noted I share Jinmei's view about the clarity of the I-D.

Special thanks to Sean Turner for the shepherd's detailed write-up including
the WG consensus *and* the justification of the intended status.

I hope that this review has helped to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric