IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MLS] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-mls-protocol-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 01 February 2023 11:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC041C1782C3; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 03:17:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9J1VRl_PWC1; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 03:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0AAC1782BF; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 03:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:f498:885e:1c55:69be]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 196151D0E58; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 13:16:54 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1675250214; bh=JkH63f2se5CKdx4KVJxGPgpP/fjMrLteCAv1UEjyXvU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Ex+vk3MjzZ04Y0quAIcHbSIEpnXqK5vZDeugi7Tl639Olhf4lEnZCZ2ZmKgrloHNa 2gCSTdRmfLai/76H84MpMfD+7TLAOWj1ulQVMtjA8kYvGP6S27nZJd6uoUkbxI6bZZ 9uALPLVw2XjIjSdrb+vnw4gwFKNaAUTC1biot2Hs=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C24FFBA3-405D-4551-B3AA-16A1B03D8E74"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgRmfxtxwp3gWhXb+mt+mG7W=PP8OVps7YqZxKT-x0cNLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 13:16:56 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <0367E18A-30F0-4A05-AC37-0B7A318C9764@eggert.org>
References: <167515571410.49520.3365459236396190476@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL02cgRmfxtxwp3gWhXb+mt+mG7W=PP8OVps7YqZxKT-x0cNLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.400.51.1.1)
X-MailScanner-ID: 196151D0E58.A3791
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/GrwQwoAkCNR2XVrOY8y926sHFvM>
Subject: Re: [MLS] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-mls-protocol-17: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 11:17:07 -0000

Hi,

On Jan 31, 2023, at 16:44, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
> With that context, I think either "MLS WG" or "IETF" makes sense.  We could also elide that line altogether; RFC 8447 does not explicitly say what Recommended means, it just states the rules.  Absent any further objections, I'll plan to change to "IETF".

That change would address my concern, thanks.

>   ### Unclear RFC status
> 
> Intended RFC status in datatracker is "Proposed Standard", but document says
> "Informational".
> 
> PS is correct.

Chairs should correct the datatracker state accordingly.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email