Re: [MLS] WGLC for "The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) Protocol"

[thomas leavy <[e-mail]>]

Agreed, we should resolve the current set of issues, but outside of that I would say the document is ready. 

Thanks,

- Tom

> On May 18, 2022, at 11:13 AM, Raphael Robert <ietf=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I second Richard on that, the issues and PRs are worth addressing. Beyond that, I think all major issues that were known to or raised by the WG have been addressed and the discussion in the recent past has mostly been about polishing the document.
> 
> Raphael
> 
>> On 18. May 2022, at 03:55, Richard Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> Just to provide an overall opinion here — I agree with several of the issues raised in GitHub and on the mailing list here.  We should fix work through what has been filed.  But overall, my assessment is that once we get the currently filed issues resolved, the document is in fine shape to go to the IESG. 
>> 
>> —Richard
>> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 20:13 Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> Please note that we had a number of Issues and PRs issued in the GH repo. Please see:
>>> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-protocol
>>> 
>>> We will need to work through these in the coming days/weeks.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> spt
>>> 
>>> > On May 17, 2022, at 12:00, Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Thanks for the reminder Richard.
>>> > 
>>> > spt
>>> > 
>>> > Sent from my iPhone
>>> > 
>>> >> On May 16, 2022, at 18:21, Richard Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> Hey all,
>>> >> 
>>> >> Reminder that the deadline for comments is tomorrow!
>>> >> 
>>> >> I did a full "print it out and get out your pen" read-through Friday and today, took about 9 hours total (not including time to file issues).  So you still have time if you get started soon!
>>> >> 
>>> >> BTW, while there are a few small things left to fix, this document is in really good shape overall, and I'm proud that we have major contributions from so many people in it.  Appreciate you all!
>>> >> 
>>> >> --Richard
>>> >> 
>>> >> 
>>> >> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:24 PM Richard Barnes <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> >> Thanks Sean.  A first round of LC issues and PRs have been posted by Britta, Brendan, and me.  If folks could please take a look and comment, we should be able to get these closed expeditiously!
>>> >> 
>>> >> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-protocol/issues
>>> >> https://github.com/mlswg/mls-protocol/pulls
>>> >> 
>>> >> On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 1:50 PM Sean Turner <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> >> This email starts the working group last call for "The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) Protocol", located here:
>>> >> 
>>> >>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mls-protocol/
>>> >> 
>>> >> Please review the document and send your comments to the list by May 17, 2022.
>>> >> 
>>> >> Note the the GitHub repository for this draft can be found here: 
>>> >> 
>>> >>   https://github.com/mlswg/mls-protocol
>>> >> 
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Nick and Sean   
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> MLS mailing list
>>> >> [e-mail]
>>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLS mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLS mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MLS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls