IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MLS] AppAck

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Sat, 21 November 2020 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C6F3A0D74 for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:45:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NB2fU6X8PX-R for <mls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 978A23A0D72 for <mls@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id l7so3587719qtp.8 for <mls@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:45:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=D+E51NPmbHXKUnx5BosAX+lMdTydx90dldruFUTiY7I=; b=Jwi2ZRTDlxoo8C3K+5gCOQ/DQvomHFp3CL4Gjq3hK9b+1hhnvnKctVWLubLft54oR9 b8jgde7X6+BTeoTa44+QMieTfoC+WEXJ9PwGyREoQcD897JhSNZhsPcZDA0sTYRqFO72 Dr39BIXCaQIps0xPFWDugSRF1gQk4K2uYWam3EsRprf1qwlbEdBAdjSAEMWogNgO6j3E mVKJei43/VInV4iwHKVNiiH4T5oxVJeUuRf37Z6EW88n9vkVPW4rO8ZDo7W0qCRnK8/l Wzb06K+P1KSea6rG+NDRUPhUKXMFRDH/KO/bShds/w8Ejk8foc34TfZFGEUTGUl4aaoP wJEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=D+E51NPmbHXKUnx5BosAX+lMdTydx90dldruFUTiY7I=; b=UY20asz3IDdDLDrLnnWT+/7Tb0FpkGv3dTLUseWRnvCheFaH00aQ9nXtQnpyQDRfJ/ g8zQpZaGf8MxFE510tDMSMXNwAxPTozyuj6JiuM5gfH5FeXtBF8k1ue3QxQzwazibMt/ vMBAd4oFEsesnI/jjCiGgDlMuSMPDI7jLEofwTqAyakHhMOePVuQDz2RW0dCXfeywtJ+ 8otK57A6sLaQCnlgJyffizF3RZ6YAXp2J5DL4A3h6EdAhiQzamJguiRJZWPy8sr6mIa1 VDbEJ9TdEbGx9cmHXX5eXgKJXQYpIGiyzG1/30moPeH5v+818n3hkTczrOdUggeYWp3j iYaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EbbdzoWGLYNQh41bA8PTcS9ymSPZfb+BW0h5Ei8wCL3GYhm1i XjxplWh0F9N2MBe0e7IXT44GxJ+vbhef46Q7BAP4xlxYSaY9jg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7iS8jnSXXZjNaAzdEUNRxhRjvnfYYt3foIVindXCinHkEccCcv7zkG/ajg9qoFg4hr930P/qnZbv3iWLo1xU=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2043:: with SMTP id 61mr11776515qta.191.1605991518142; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:45:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:45:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgT9VUoTBLG_bZGwYrTBPLyC5qco_nejcUv55K28VcECYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Messaging Layer Security WG <mls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f396e205b4a40998"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mls/NZ6mf-UHArQ0dCBOlo09C1VS8_Y>
Subject: [MLS] AppAck
X-BeenThere: mls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Messaging Layer Security <mls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mls>, <mailto:mls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 20:45:21 -0000

Hey all,

For one more "feature" before feature freeze, I've just posted a PR for an
AppAck proposal.  This is joint work with Raphael and Benjamin, who had the
idea of doing a proposal for this; I'm really just the scribe.

https://github.com/mlswg/mls-protocol/pull/442

This PR addresses issue #160, which dates all the way back to May 2019.
You may recall that Benjamin raised it on the IETF call last week.  The
idea is to enable the members of the group to detect when the DS drops
application messages.

Please take a look, and speak up with any comments.  I would like to merge
this (or decide not to) in the next week or so, so that we can get draft-11
out and begin feature freeze / analysis.

Thanks,
--Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email