[MLS] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-mls-architecture-11: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mls-architecture-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mls-architecture/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank to Yoav Nir for the SECDIR review.

Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS and COMMENT feedback

==

** Section 7.4.2.1.  Please provide a reference for “mixnet”.

** Section 7.4.3.1.  Please provide a reference for “CRLite”.

** Section 7.5.

(a) Section 7.5. *RECOMMENDATION:* Additional steps should be taken to protect
the
      device and the MLS clients from physical compromise.  In such
      settings, HSMs and secure enclaves can be used to protect
      signature keys.

(b) Section 7.3.4 RECOMMENDATION: Signature private keys should be
compartmentalized from other secrets and preferably protected by an HSM or
dedicated hardware features to allow recovery of the authentication for future
messages after a compromise.

Why is the use of HSM to protect keys repeated twice?