Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 35

Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> Mon, 16 February 2009 07:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lenglish5@cox.net>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AB328B797 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:14:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.867, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1H01-lbF7fEK for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (fed1rmmtao105.cox.net [68.230.241.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FD628B23E for <mmox@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:14:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090216071408.UEWR8485.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:14:08 -0500
Received: from Macintosh.local ([72.200.120.202]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id GXE81b0024N6T0Q04XE8UT; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:14:08 -0500
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=MthLulolaBoA:10 a=r-rcRZjYqYEA:10 a=Wajolswj7cQA:10 a=_Jxp2Z5NSIhfSq2imUYA:9 a=Z7xHXdNq2iCjexaANu3zDJvXix0A:4 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=oltf0pfCdT4A:10
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <49991240.7060000@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:14:08 -0700
From: Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dahlia Trimble <dahliatrimble@gmail.com>
References: <20090215.183611.637.0@webmail07.vgs.untd.com> <4998AEA0.7060703@cox.net> <ab84ceb10902151711t5450c2a6x66aa90d6b5cc84ff@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ab84ceb10902151711t5450c2a6x66aa90d6b5cc84ff@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 35
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lenglish5@cox.net
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:14:01 -0000

Dahlia Trimble wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net 
> <mailto:lenglish5@cox.net>> wrote:
> ...
>
>
>     2) Hypergrid, which assumes that all avatars are equally
>     authorized for access to all services within a given set of
>     participating worlds/grids.
>
>  
>
> The current prototype implementation of Hypergrid may be described in 
> this manner but there have also been discussions about how to add 
> access restrictions to content that might be shared between grids.
>   
My hope is that this body will acknowledge the need for the two 
extremes, and develop protocols that will work with either extreme or 
compromise/combination, so that policy can be set AND made public in a 
wide variety of ways as world/grid hosting providers and their 
customers/clients require.


L.