[mmox] Service Regions - Cloud Services - overlap?

Kajikawa Jeremy <belxjander@gmail.com> Wed, 18 March 2009 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <belxjander@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350893A6A0D for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.403, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Khkwkp2BsyNm for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f160.google.com (mail-gx0-f160.google.com [209.85.217.160]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A7D3A6AD7 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk4 with SMTP id 4so902107gxk.13 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to :disposition-notification-to:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; bh=t4eEXb9Gu0simBYtUy7BXBXAU727W+7VIIFX8ZeUtZk=; b=oiLGE6vY9XobFRP5nsO1U6229OhvCT/OdoCglWF0IL7ILTs5kAVBySiyxZ+RwliqmB 3eAzFzNwIUg0Gy3NMDaILluKQy1CAn0z4Sh320i1L182zXROu3R2x8BhetC10UbIXTe5 avKQKzUPZbVxl32Qo+NVCAYufHThV7hGVt8ag=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:disposition-notification-to:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=QCRm0tHya5nho7MTmrNWvIKygi9R7oeOeuqw/3a/vzpE+15pT4Vp3GkjXAaeclKWOB ZpOF9IxihrLjUelRlX6kF/X8pPRoZVc9XvaFbXiO9Z5tP0mnAsifUz3Noy0YrY+Yb0p7 htXUmzDZDR1zX80AYPYEZPpcYvwDohn6s1SF0=
Received: by 10.142.14.18 with SMTP id 18mr511980wfn.35.1237378794555; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.2.1.3? (p3159-ipbfp201tottori.tottori.ocn.ne.jp [122.21.102.159]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm108675wfa.59.2009.03.18.05.19.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kajikawa Jeremy <belxjander@gmail.com>
To: mmox@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-k+KBNoI8XEoGjW1hSLdm"
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:19:51 +0900
Message-Id: <1237378791.14379.8.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4
Subject: [mmox] Service Regions - Cloud Services - overlap?
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:19:12 -0000

Ive been reading about Eucalyptus (http://eucalyptus.cs.ucsb.edu/)
 and AppScale (http://appscale.cs.ucsb.edu/) ...

And it occurs to me that this may be similar for managing regions
  for various VirtualWorld services.

Would knowing each region "type" (SecondLife/Olive/other?)
  have a bearing on how to interact with it from whatever Service
  has as a client-specific front-end?

Allowing for a given service to run "entrance proxy" server units
  for supportable clients into a given system.

maybe an OSgrid.org login server for non-SecondLife clients would
  be possible? ...

where the proxy runs access of the local(hosting) service for the
  non-local-compatible client ...

a per-client instance proxy with local representation of where in the
service
  the client is currently viewing...

Would this kind of "gatekeeper" be plausible using existing
technologies?
  or is this getting side-tracked from the real issues of this group?

Curious,
  Jeremy