Re: [mmox] MMOX Protocol Proposals

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2009 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6653A6A7A for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:28:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-KP4LmdpaoJ for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CD73A6818 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l9so2694313rvb.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:28:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xuOGfehBYTWTFA+auHDRxLuGg2ZoXek3GkHJ6kthqi0=; b=tjX1Lt5viD/yPT9TwMr27x+ZmOw9sx0kPSUoU1IkzdAbJK7LwcHlizVydf4zjWh/d5 JgQQsQS8BEh0OVMuQcz74f59khvv+xE/4vTgYogCw2MNKRW/IXk2OzrRC4G2fIUDyprD MUhp6AuHzoHvLxszE7vTLYzXXpd4W9el+7ZgI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qV3HkU7C9ZKMaboOzqdSSKWT11vcjYCcb+HeGWj1a0uQtulP1dIpGvKqY9mTXgXioa M/iXb4u60MBskzDitRI5kXNn//RbJ0WDm1La6dmD5QYjitmGY4mmnpUeamqt3cpMf7xp 81hQJkjjEz+k9o79YcnNg4sD9sWk156K0V7Ao=
Received: by 10.141.20.6 with SMTP id x6mr3740966rvi.159.1236115694591; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.10.111.233? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm5891464rvf.8.2009.03.03.13.28.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49ADA0ED.2040002@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:28:13 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0902280342v7c877182iba35a012f1649460@mail.gmail.com> <ca722a9e0903030956w252d742aj135ba58b3bec2727@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ca722a9e0903030956w252d742aj135ba58b3bec2727@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: MMOX-IETF <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] MMOX Protocol Proposals
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:28:21 -0000

By request, I have clarified the server-to-server simulation model 
underlying cross-technology interoperability, and re-submitted the LESS 
proposal with a name related to the MMOX:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-ietf-mmox-less-protocol-00.txt

Sincerely,

jw


Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> These don't all appear to be available as Internet-Drafts.
> Officially, IETF meetings discuss Internet-Drafts, not documents
> published in other venues.  Internet-Drafts contain the boilerplate
> where authors agree to IPR disclosure rules, so it's important from
> that perspective as well as for people who attend the meeting but
> don't follow the mailing list closely to know what to read.
>
> Unfortunately, the deadline for brand-new Internet-Drafts in the
> official repository is tomorrow.
>
> Lisa
>