Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 127

William George <wjgeorge@dceo.rutgers.edu> Tue, 24 February 2009 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <wjgeorge@dceo.rutgers.edu>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D533A69FE for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:56:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TpOndIwNGvjH for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:56:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350703A67AE for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:56:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so2347386yxm.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:56:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.106.12 with SMTP id e12mr6013521anc.18.1235490988283; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:56:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2768.1235442141.5094.mmox@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.2768.1235442141.5094.mmox@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:56:28 -0500
Message-ID: <27a487810902240756y708e667arb965dc7b1e17c987@mail.gmail.com>
From: William George <wjgeorge@dceo.rutgers.edu>
To: mmox@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d3a47ad91b0463ac29f5
Subject: Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 127
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:11 -0000

jw wrote:
> :Btw: nobody has told me what "rez" actually stands for, and why that
word would be better to use than just "instantiate."

its the opposite of de-rezzed (de -resolved). And it sounds cool:  "i just
rezzed in"

googled:

http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/D/de-rezz.html

Waka