[MMUSIC] [Errata Verified] RFC3264 (3818)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 03 December 2013 08:44 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7451AE08E; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 00:44:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrEG74WUOCo5; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 00:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E215D1AE094; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 00:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 745F579E001; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 00:43:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Jorgen.Axell@ericsson.com, jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com, schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131203084348.745F579E001@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:43:48 -0800
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] [Errata Verified] RFC3264 (3818)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 08:44:22 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC3264, "An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3264&eid=3818 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Jörgen Axell <Jorgen.Axell@ericsson.com> Date Reported: 2013-12-02 Verified by: Gonzalo Camarillo (IESG) Section: 4 Original Text ------------- The agent receiving the offer MAY generate an answer, or it MAY reject the offer. The means for rejecting an offer are dependent on the higher layer protocol. The offer/answer exchange is atomic; if the answer is rejected, the session reverts to the state prior to the offer (which may be absence of a session). Corrected Text -------------- The agent receiving the offer MAY generate an answer, or it MAY reject the offer. The means for rejecting an offer are dependent on the higher layer protocol. The offer/answer exchange is atomic; if the offer is rejected, the session reverts to the state prior to the offer (which may be absence of a session). Notes ----- You can't reject an answer. When the answer is received the SDP negotiation is completed. -------------------------------------- RFC3264 (draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-02) -------------------------------------- Title : An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP) Publication Date : June 2002 Author(s) : J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [MMUSIC] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3264 (381… RFC Errata System
- [MMUSIC] [Errata Verified] RFC3264 (3818) RFC Errata System