IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Aligning RFC 4572 and draft-dtls-sdp regarding preferred SHA cipher?

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Tue, 05 April 2016 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0210512D542 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MrDBLlXAv6Qz for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp122.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp122.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B142012D535 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 107DA8050F; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp8.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 3323E804F9; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:15:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [10.24.66.110] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [128.107.241.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.5.4); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:15:20 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E411AC@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:15:17 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF8F12B2-BB77-4EC8-B670-8DF37C38E627@iii.ca>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37E411AC@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/6PCjg99G9E3s6dLHWd-gQBrWcTE>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Aligning RFC 4572 and draft-dtls-sdp regarding preferred SHA cipher?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:15:23 -0000

I agree we need multiple hashes. I think the device checking the fingerprints should through out hashes that use an algorithm it does not trust, then make sure *one* of the remaining hash matches.

There were use cases discussed in meeting on why.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email