Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Session bandwidth (Re: comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-01)

Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com> Wed, 12 December 2012 09:55 UTC

Return-Path: <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE10021F8977 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:55:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.581, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQRw5CozRRqZ for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D3021F8978 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:55:31 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7fb26d000006129-8a-50c8548cd8c0
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E5.89.24873.C8458C05; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:55:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:55:24 +0100
Message-ID: <50C8548B.5040306@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:55:23 +0100
From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
References: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C088281048DF@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com> <5097DF12.2020209@alvestrand.no> <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C08828107CCF@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <92B7E61ADAC1BB4F941F943788C08828107CCF@xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW5PyIkAg1WrpCw2zfrCZnGsr4vN YuryxywOzB5XJlxh9ZjyeyOrx5IlP5kCmKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mqb8XsdesIy74tM3lQbG qZxdjJwcEgImEq0HtrJC2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjJKNE+8zIzhLOcUWLisbMsIFW8AtoSP+5t ZQOxWQRUJY7OfswIYrMJWEjc/NEIFhcV8JWYtecXE0S9oMTJmU/AekUEDCUWTVoHZHNwMAuE SJw6mwESFhbIldh6cxsrxK5VjBIzvrxmBklwCnhLPGvewA5xnaTEommdYHOYBfQkplxtYYSw 5SWat84GqxcCuq2hqYN1AqPQLCSrZyFpmYWkZQEj8ypG9tzEzJz0cqNNjMDwPbjlt+oOxjvn RA4xSnOwKInzWm/d4y8kkJ5YkpqdmlqQWhRfVJqTWnyIkYmDU6qBUWqX+VSjqXF3sm/WHLrP d+LvDYOT20JEb6ql3rcM+OvfraZ90beiNubqT57HvDOuZk3QX78kiKvsz4H7faf29M3XPRp9 cXNbUNT5Wz8/ZATOcDIQKeE9/y1/4leNBKkiGfZdlrOOy2e6remMtrrQ0DyjYMn1JMa93y/J Lzt/N+/119J5heE7niuxFGckGmoxFxUnAgD+j9+uLQIAAA==
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Session bandwidth (Re: comments on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-01)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:55:36 -0000

Hi,

Going through old emails. One important comment:

On 2012-11-05 21:04, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) wrote:
>>
>> Last time I looked b=CT was scoped to a whole conference ("supplied for
>> the session"), while b=AS was scoped to a single RTP session. But I may
>> be misinterpreting RFC 4566 section 5.8.
> 
> I recommend using b=TIAS, as defined in RFC 3890. This parameter may be used at either the session or the media level, and it scope accordingly. 
> What needs to be avoided is summing up the b=TIAS/AS values from the bundled media lines and using that as that bandwidth for the bundle even if it exceeds the b=TIAS/AS/CT value from the session level.
> 

I would note that TIAS has no definition in Offer/Answer context. It is
soley defined for Declarative usage. Yes, I know it is being used in O/A
contexts, but I still don't understand how a receiver can state the
actual packet rate to be used by the sender to enable correct calculation.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------