Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-12: (with COMMENT) - Christer's 2nd reply
Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se> Wed, 08 April 2020 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460DA3A16A5; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=egensajt.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M9ZfbpWGh_cO; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:17:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.egensajt.se (smtp.egensajt.se [194.68.80.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02E63A16A7; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.136] (h83-209-157-29.cust.a3fiber.se [83.209.157.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se) by smtp.egensajt.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82DF520B6C; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 23:17:33 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=egensajt.se; s=dkim; t=1586380655; bh=nnVz8MwLMtRcAAijnwHlq38f1cW+lK7/lw834QzeOSY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Teqa/A6qKnBwHr3leZ2VQEL/QGb5lYfIpX7g0oIUG/NPoAI+D/yGF8csoQVPW5fcM 4dsOO69PG8c3H3X+sOvwkBU82L2DRWh1wgWPZhGNFZ/rcO4OYG0YR5fHvytHUSR3R/ 85EILedHnspIr25v3wdff+mFTRYZvJ4mhPI4Ojx0=
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "fandreas@cisco.com" <fandreas@cisco.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel@ietf.org>
References: <96271E3C-9242-442F-9BB9-74F23BA3C575@ericsson.com>
From: Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se>
Message-ID: <9c542a03-14c5-386e-4fd3-c20733c13168@ghaccess.se>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 23:17:32 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <96271E3C-9242-442F-9BB9-74F23BA3C575@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C5F29BA5788EF046669A8BD6"
Content-Language: sv
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/7bg6aQ74qPUGlu0sroXnrq1BW3g>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel-12: (with COMMENT) - Christer's 2nd reply
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 04:52:04 -0000
Hi, Please note that I am moving to a new e-mail address. Den 2020-04-08 kl. 23:01, skrev Christer Holmberg: > > Hi, > > I noted there were one more place where Gunnar asked for my input. I > am addressing that in this reply. > > (Gunnar, let me know if there is something I've missed.) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ..... > > Section 5.2 > > >> > > >> Each T140block is sent on the SCTP stream [RFC4960] used to > realize > > >> the T.140 data channel using standard T.140 transmission > procedures > > >> [T140]. [...] > > >> > > >> I'm not really sure what is meant by "standard T.140 transmission > > >> procedures" -- is that supposed to cover the process by which > the webrtc > > >> stack receives the T.140 input or something done within webrtc? > > > > > > This is esseentially chapter 7 of T.140. It is at least to use > UTF-8 > > > coding as specified in T.140. And start after channel > establishment by > > > sending UTF-8 BOM. It is also to not buffer longer than 500 ms, even if > > > that is also said in another place. > > >> > > >> Data sending and reporting procedures conform to [T140]. > > >> > > >> I don't see any instance of the string "report" in > > >> file:///home/bkaduk/Downloads/T-REC-T.140-199802-I!!PDF-E.pdf; am I > > >> missing something? > > > > > > Right. There is only one response specified in T.140. It is the > > > "Unsupported request" in section 8.7. But that cannot really be called a > > > report. Maybe another reference was intended here. > > > draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel could be intended for the > sending, but it > > > has nothing on reporting. W3C webrtc has requirements on > reporting for > > > statistics, but I doubt that that was intended. Over to Christer... > > I don’t know where “reporting” is coming from. It was already in the > old schwarz draft (that this draft replaced). > > I also had a look in T.140, and couldn’t find anything related to > reporting. > > My suggestion is to remove it. > Fine with me. /Gunnar > Regards, > > Christer > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic -- Gunnar Hellström GHAccess gunnar.hellstrom@ghaccess.se
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on dra… Christer Holmberg