Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #2: Rules for Answerer payload type selection
Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Mon, 12 March 2012 16:29 UTC
Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E1711E8091 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.103, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S45otSFTNK4G for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90E511E808F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.21) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:29:06 -0400
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.216]) by Mail1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.208]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:29:06 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: "mmusic (E-mail)" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mmusic] #2: Rules for Answerer payload type selection
Thread-Index: AQHNAG09uF2WeKAKIUW5RemaqhyJow==
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:29:05 +0000
Message-ID: <2053E037-A8A4-4F01-BD3F-3B9FF989E50C@acmepacket.com>
References: <063.2ea57b41e0be5050c487b56fc2e0d848@trac.tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <063.2ea57b41e0be5050c487b56fc2e0d848@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.0.0.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <8304500BC7B8C146BCB4089D2A698634@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #2: Rules for Answerer payload type selection
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:29:11 -0000
I propose we remove the payload types from the: a=<loopback-mode>:<fmt> … attribute, because they are repetitive and complicate the logic, since it's bizarre to not have them match the m-line (other than for the encap mode, but that has its own rtpmap anyway). So I propose the offer/answer just have this: a=loopback-source Or a=loopback-mirror without specifying the payload types in those attributes - just use the m-line like normal SDP. -hadriel On Nov 22, 2011, at 3:47 AM, mmusic issue tracker wrote: > #2: Rules for Answerer payload type selection > > From Magnus: > > Section 5.4 > I am missing clear rules for the cases when I might exclude payload > types from loopback-mode attributes compared to the m= lines. Are this > only the loopback payload types? What happens if I exclude a regular > media payload format? > > -- > -----------------------------+------------------------ > Reporter: hkaplan@… | Owner: hkaplan@… > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 > Component: media-loopback | Version: 1.0 > Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords: > -----------------------------+------------------------ > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mmusic/trac/ticket/2> > mmusic <http://tools.ietf.org/mmusic/> >
- [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #2: Rules for Answerer payload … mmusic issue tracker
- Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #2: Rules for Answerer payl… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #2: Rules for Answerer payl… mmusic issue tracker