IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-28: (with COMMENT) - All comments should now have been addressed

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 30 August 2017 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7B4132932; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ENg-QzR1s576; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C805A13248B; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v7UJRt1X064024 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:27:56 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <244f9778-9cc4-eb99-bec1-f1905e7ec00e@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:27:55 -0500
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Roman Shpount <rshpount@turbobridge.com>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BA784578-8446-4971-98B8-92AE13BE2700@nostrum.com>
References: <D5CC6091.208BE%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <244f9778-9cc4-eb99-bec1-f1905e7ec00e@nostrum.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/9ztBVKYEEUDzzo36ZOkw7sAgtOs>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-28: (with COMMENT) - All comments should now have been addressed
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:28:08 -0000

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 1:03 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 8/30/17 04:31, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I have updated the PR. It should now address the IESG comments given by
>> Adam, Ekr, Alexey and Mirja.
>> 
>> https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-dtls-sdp/pull/35
>> 
>> 
>> In the latest commit (#7):
>> 
>> - Section 7 (Transport Protocol Considerations) was removed.
>> - Text regarding correlation of SDP and TLS connection was added to the
>> Security Considerations (as requested by Mirja).
>> 
>> Please let me know if there is something I¹ve forgot.
> 
> The list of issues I posted to MMUSIC included the question about whether ufrag change requires a DTLS restart in the absence of a 'tls-id'. There was a bit of discussion on that list which seemed to conclude that it should *not*. I believe the document needs to reflect this -- but I'd specifically ask the MMUSIC chairs whether they see consensus on this point first.

I concur.

Chairs, what do you think?

> 
> On the topic of looking over your changes: it's still easier to read a text-form document than digging through XML source. Version numbers are free. I encourage you to drop a new version whenever you ask people to look at changes.

I agree here, too. Christer, can you submit a revision with the changes so far?

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email