Re: [MMUSIC] UP: Can a partial offer be a full offer?

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 21 August 2013 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D3211E83A8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.341
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.341 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OsRq+Ky5VBHw for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C9E11E839A for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FNYT1m0020cZkys53RaEqW; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:34:14 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FRaE1m00G3ZTu2S3WRaEG1; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:34:14 +0000
Message-ID: <5214C1D5.10201@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:34:13 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41D8F9@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41D9A9@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <89C72647-EF4A-4825-A506-A5128DECFD14@oracle.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C41DA7A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113678D66@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C44E693@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <5213E4A6.3010704@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C473198@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C473198@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1377092054; bh=uM7rPuf8bLf3XR7sRzJSit7cJv14qB1mkSjj/ZjXEdc=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=U4JvZ6GKcEK1Yn1loyPwE9C3V6vam9xtimBNEgWF2hPa/yKHGCYum7DRKRdOa1ZA+ +mVT4eG/QRZuXiSgqlnQTJa59cYHaj537qaoLJlSVdZF9JLg6XFqYERAcbbQR100dN zZ+VH+w3tgZKAJ8v8f7fifW3UeMR4F2QUPcWMmeg3nHIPi00Lq1os7QNzt0seM14C0 GHczVQwoh8oFFtWpwxHJY1iWKhntnXEU/algA/ulyT9cRG56bXLVGwIoMgScLdrQbp Zo36nN/+v5gy2ZepVl0VglqKi84mQ70kkdWa9CRoWbqSm4AtNjvt7eqzWbIsoJknfM k2h38d5ZqJtiQ==
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] UP: Can a partial offer be a full offer?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:34:22 -0000

On 8/21/13 2:19 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> MAYBE we could restrict usage of POF/PANs, and say that they MUST NOT be used to change session level information...
>>
>> I was assuming it was obvious that this must not be the case.
>> The POFs and PANs (AFAIK) only contain the media sections they intend to change, so they don't contain the session level stuff.
>> If you change session level stuff, then you should need a real offer.
>
> Keep in mind that the o- line, which IS session level, IS modified each time a POF/PAN is sent.

Good point.

> Maybe we should use media level o- lines for POFs/PANs....

I don't know how you could do that in a backward compatible way.

	Thanks,
	Paul