Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-02 - (RFC3407 Related)
Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Mon, 15 July 2013 05:29 UTC
Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FD521F9D5C for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtswTfJLaaIj for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B971A21F9C4F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5662; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1373866146; x=1375075746; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=0chS8ckt9qbuvlk/66c+wVnHMqqynQeMbf6gORNM0uE=; b=A3gVweK8z/gw+kIFBbtXNZrcbb8hf+YGyD95a6xTgo1df/TqL4aYmjul EXa8ArgaKDi6/dJIq0j9odjQcYneZ/s53LDYeeKPN0HZ/18kGXhuMI6q0 bPs6lmiRjmCvhgP8N7nV0RcIZVzv4EpizwwKWAwvCQoTnNkkgD9RJiY/S A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtAjAGmI41GtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABaJoJgNIkypGoClACBDhZ0giMBAQEBA3gBEAsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcBAYgMDLUtj2QHg3gDl1yBKZAkgVmBVSA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,667,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="234801370"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2013 05:28:57 +0000
Received: from Flemmings-MacBook-Pro.local (rtp-vpn4-549.cisco.com [10.82.210.37]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6F5SuKJ011191; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:28:57 GMT
Message-ID: <51E3475B.7040803@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:50:35 -0400
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAMRcRGRhwp74W8hBtxMw6jWiXsPmOJS+PBnJ2=pEkmAfVCXU3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRcRGRhwp74W8hBtxMw6jWiXsPmOJS+PBnJ2=pEkmAfVCXU3A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090708050004090607080703"
Cc: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-02 - (RFC3407 Related)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 05:29:11 -0000
Section 5.20 (RFC 3407), refers to the following attributes with their category shown in brackets (note: changed "csdc" to "cdsc"): a=sqn (NORMAL) a=cdsc (TBD) a=cpar (TBD) a=cparmin (TBD) a=cparmax (TBD) I agree with the "sqn" category of NORMAL. For the rest of them, the challenge we have is that they are essentially what we could call "encapsulating" attributes, i.e. they simply encode attributes or other parameters. This leads to a problem that may apply to other attributes as well: Currently, the mux mechanism seeems to only distinguish attributes at the attribute name level, however there are attributes where you have the same attribute-name appear many times, but further parameters in the attribute distinguish these (and as per the above, this distinction may in turn lead to different categories). Also note, that these attributes to not actually negotiate use of their encapsulated values; a separate signaling mechanism, e.g. O/A exchange, would be needed for this (as noted in RFC 3407, Section 2). For "cdsc", I'd be inclined to put it in category "NORMAL", but for the rest of them, I'm not sure any of the current categories match, since it really depends on what was encapsulated in them (note that both bandwith and attributes can be encapsulated in them). Thanks -- Flemming On 4/26/13 5:24 PM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote: > Hello Flemming > This is a request for reviewing the following sections > 5.20 > > of the draft > draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-02 > > It will be greatly appreciated if you could inform on your willingness > for reviewing the aforementioned sessions. > > It would be great to have your review feedback/comments/inputs before > June 9th 2013. > > The document is available here: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-02 > > > Thanks in Advance > > Regards > Suhas Nandakumar
- [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mmusic… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mm… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mm… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mm… Flemming Andreasen