Re: [MMUSIC] DTLS-over-SCTP, anyone?

"Schwarz, Albrecht (Nokia - DE)" <albrecht.schwarz@nokia.com> Mon, 08 February 2016 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <albrecht.schwarz@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12E81B2CF9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZWsnVPGzlLf for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552631B2CED for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:12:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711umx2.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.39]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id A2B33D1040C6; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:12:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by fr711umx2.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u18FCfq6001607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:12:42 GMT
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u18FCekf015661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:12:41 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.125]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:12:41 +0100
From: "Schwarz, Albrecht (Nokia - DE)" <albrecht.schwarz@nokia.com>
To: EXT Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DTLS-over-SCTP, anyone?
Thread-Index: AdFifWfdkaVD/jTcSayjXmDCDAdsrgABI8dA
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:12:40 +0000
Message-ID: <786615F3A85DF44AA2A76164A71FE1ACE19A359C@FR711WXCHMBA03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37DBF1AD@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37DBF1AD@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_786615F3A85DF44AA2A76164A71FE1ACE19A359CFR711WXCHMBA03z_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/K5E_su4dWQjrPzuVepHvONzZ4dA>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] DTLS-over-SCTP, anyone?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:12:49 -0000

Hello Christer,

the titel of the (future) RFC will not exclude any SCTP transport modes.
And a comprehensive and future safe protocol specification should cover all existing ones, which is "DTLS/SCTP/IP" as well as "SCTP/UDP/IP" (RFC 6951).
These two SCTP transport modes should be indicated as well, independent of potential intentions to be used soon.
Codepoint space could be reserved, placeholder sections tagged as "not yet supported" of "for further studies", etc, but the worst case would be any kind of interaction issues in future.

My view,
Albrecht


From: mmusic [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of EXT Christer Holmberg
Sent: Montag, 8. Februar 2016 15:33
To: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] DTLS-over-SCTP, anyone?

Hi,

draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp currently defines the SDP O/A procedures for SCTP, SCTP-over-DTLS, and DTLS-over-SCTP.

As we know, SCTP-over-DTLS is used for the WebRTC data channel.

My question is: does anyone intend to use DTLS-over-SCTP?

Regards,

Christer