IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-37: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 06 August 2019 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DE9120427 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G3598FRmFQms for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB321204AF for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 09:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id d1so9081797pgp.4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 09:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SfmRmGMM2tGYwrgz8cN74LUeR26IIdjnzKnt6gDQfqM=; b=OHQRk7PA1g2J4fWVObNlhRfT7yytcHg3zzpAUCq/sonl8xiWO4Rpj3ToRBNJOAVCNs qYQt/7K/npvnWCuz9ZPvC8KZMpNh39dzOc7thcvhiK6BJREW+/Mo9p7mOQtl7dz0Tgfv fL7sNasdcv2AXzh1FKtM1ZlDS6Z9lgWgyk5AvThZFp/Vo3/lkZzkTY6y+AF/5CqJpY6L B+6OPDK4j9gkLZzwq/4ABZusYyUKjOrTtXTm1P7rJ/B9k5tLpWUnkH7sHr9gSy+ZsVd3 7j/S5kxmb6jmBWERCAVn9QJPcEmzDegDHVhSKtPS/RtguQEBD+0jZlr2TVYlsVMsm8V9 Chjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SfmRmGMM2tGYwrgz8cN74LUeR26IIdjnzKnt6gDQfqM=; b=fthuXPILKJ+o8icj6sCqmCQrAHKshNTmB25sp2zPTkALfT33iZTS/PxiKFUyngu3Pz BjZIAV9CyqbWj7P3IfqgEXpuidazd1go1taD0KWJraSedq5zupN3nhQK72yZpptASeMN ElvwteA7tTHSuqlcQ5P+6jBeabkQMuGZj3wJ+UC4YV1NhFY/1PypUJafZXF5fDltbVeK KcB1ODIdWeLpwKq4W9Dmwq0znoycaSgym/4Xui09BTYnldQUxbwyHSSdvKHwcKEruieT 2HulbLBdshtNYc1xJXfFcM+Kls2OsBYJ3MDowF7x8XB4fftnkXjV0ja93n4JvOu226tQ QKUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2zN/VgsOiKjvnwyVOeMXWfR6brY5ejXFNvaNnh5thwj6SPGVq FtVX6rGGiojmP3MGVXJBEdZ71Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzyUbXqFG7RFcNI8IQLvrN6RbFCN6NVf3kXCCbWOvL04wlL1jUjZWw7CF1zjYDMP1TC8zn4rw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:37ac:: with SMTP id v41mr4018160pjb.6.1565110455043; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 09:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com. [209.85.214.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h14sm114372342pfq.22.2019.08.06.09.54.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Aug 2019 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id c14so38023650plo.0; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a413:: with SMTP id p19mr4159537plq.134.1565110453807; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 09:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156510716501.18086.1896150985239645556.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR07MB3161FA548529BC93131B137193D50@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB3161FA548529BC93131B137193D50@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 12:54:03 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvJv50VKuCcv2Gjv8r_UbG_m4MLqUdRH=b5PO35XcQWGA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvJv50VKuCcv2Gjv8r_UbG_m4MLqUdRH=b5PO35XcQWGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "fandreas@cisco.com" <fandreas@cisco.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a23138058f75acd9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/KRFmBNMcpG7X2EYa-J-AFUWMbK4>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-37: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:54:26 -0000

Hi Alissa,

I agree with what Christer said :)
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:37 PM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi Alissa,
>
> I didn't see the second ballot email, where you had added a DISCUSS. I
> will address that in this reply :)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Apologies for multiple ballot emails, wrapped up a bit too soon the
> first time.
> >
> > I'm confused about Section 7. The mechanisms in RFC 4091 and RFC 4092
> were deprecated
> > in RFC 5245, and this is mentioned in RFC 8445. Why does this
> specification then need to
> > additionally normatively recommend the use of ICE for dual-stack
> scenarios? This could be
> > interpreted as saying that ANAT is an alternative option for this use
> case, but it shouldn't be
> > according to RFC 8445.
>
> You are right. My suggestion is to remove Section 7.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email