Re: [MMUSIC] Suggested new milestone and adoption of draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-04 as WG item

Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Fri, 18 October 2013 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223C711E825D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.83
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.83 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r5XSx1lqGZnM for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server209.appriver.com (server209e.appriver.com [8.31.233.120]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DD311E8288 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 10/18/2013 2:13:33 PM
X-Policy: GLOBAL - vidyo.com
X-Policy: GLOBAL - vidyo.com
X-Primary: jonathan@vidyo.com
X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide
X-Virus-Scan: V-
X-Note-SnifferID: 0
X-Note: TCH-CT/SI:0-32/SG:2 10/18/2013 2:13:11 PM
X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 162.209.16.213, Ugly c=0.859708 p=-0.975709 Source White
X-Signature-Violations: 0-0-0-4345-c
X-Note-419: 15.6003 ms. Fail:0 Chk:1350 of 1350 total
X-Note: SCH-CT/SI:0-1350/SG:1 10/18/2013 2:13:15 PM
X-Note: Spam Tests Failed:
X-Country-Path: ->UNKNOWN->LOCAL
X-Note-Sending-IP: 162.209.16.213
X-Note-Reverse-DNS:
X-Note-Return-Path: jonathan@vidyo.com
X-Note: User Rule Hits:
X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G340 G341 G342 G343 G347 G348 G457
X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits:
X-Note: Mail Class: VALID
X-Note: Headers Injected
Received: from [162.209.16.213] (HELO mail.vidyo.com) by server209.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.2) with ESMTPS id 41399798; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:13:33 -0400
Received: from 492133-EXCH2.vidyo.com ([fe80::50:56ff:fe85:6b62]) by 492132-EXCH1.vidyo.com ([fe80::50:56ff:fe85:4f77%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:13:31 -0500
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Suggested new milestone and adoption of draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-04 as WG item
Thread-Index: AQHOzBs9gZhl3Wu2WUSAyyM/u+wPN5n7FxoA
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:13:30 +0000
Message-ID: <5EA4CE0C-7596-409B-AE72-BD23C9299E16@vidyo.com>
References: <526146F2.1060203@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <526146F2.1060203@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [160.79.219.114]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <42D519341BD8F84AAF33597865923190@vidyo.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Suggested new milestone and adoption of draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-04 as WG item
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:13:42 -0000

I think this is an integral and necessary part of BUNDLE -- should it really be a separate milestone?  (If the document editors want to structure the BUNDLE work as one document defining the core concepts, and another describing the applicability to all existing SDP attributes, that's fine, but it seems to me it's still one work item.)

I definitely agree this work should be adopted by the WG, though, in whatever form.

On Oct 18, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
 wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> When single 5-tuple is used for media associated with multiple SDP media descriptions (i.e., Bundle) the WG has identified the need to analyze and specify applicability and impact of different attributes on media description bundling.
> 
> The draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-04 ("Framework for SDP Attributes when Multiplexing") provides this analysis. The draft has been presented and discussed over the past few meetings and the feedback on both the need for the work and the draft itself has been positive.
> 
> Based on the above, we would like to propose adding a new milestone for
> and adoption of draft-nandakumar-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-04 as a WG item for that milestone.
> 
> If you have any comments or concerns with the above, please let us know no later than November 1st, 2013.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ari & Flemming
> (MMUSIC co-chairs)
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>