[MMUSIC] DECISION: Usage of same PT value in multiple m- lines for SAME codec configuration

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 28 June 2013 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C61B21F9F1E for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.866, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5tSpj+KBX87 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B1521F9EAC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7ef76d000004bbc-14-51cd72a90d2d
Received: from ESESSHC019.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 74.A7.19388.9A27DC15; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:25:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.6]) by ESESSHC019.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:25:29 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DECISION: Usage of same PT value in multiple m- lines for SAME codec configuration
Thread-Index: Ac5z8ekD0a7SetWORja/n46Ib+raCQ==
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:29 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BE558@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.19]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3BE558ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6qorOBBkunMFpMXf6YxYHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGXNXb2crmKpcce7UHrYGxglyXYycHBICJhI7vvYwQ9hiEhfu rWfrYuTiEBI4zChxa9k7KGcRo0TP3RtMXYwcHGwCFhLd/7RBGkQE1CW+7oVoFhaIlVh87g0L RDxJYvPNK0wQtp7E/zsfwVpZBFQl/n8wBzF5BXwl1jSlgFQwAq39fmoNWDWzgLjErSfzmSDO EZBYsuc81GmiEi8f/2OFsBUl2p82MELU50ucXT2bHcTmFRCUODnzCcsERqFZSEbNQlI2C0kZ RFxHYsHuT2wQtrbEsoWvmWHsMwceMyGLL2BkX8XInpuYmZNebr6JERjyB7f8NtjBuOm+2CFG aQ4WJXHezXpnAoUE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUwru5szK4508QueGnTiaoHnDeM +6t51RLOi5wo93ltK7L309tfPQ32zxTU8lwnfrLx+ZcvUGSs8HPyxOJnE1teuBnLHZ7h5HWN 7U9Mwts01olbnuW+LEibczfjKcv82O3lmYyR2x9fnsR9maHy944A+ePHbt5ck5z9iTMk52m6 Rla8u/lE+SOflViKMxINtZiLihMBrcpAREcCAAA=
Subject: [MMUSIC] DECISION: Usage of same PT value in multiple m- lines for SAME codec configuration
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:25:46 -0000

Hi,

In Q1, I asked whether we can agree that a PT value can only be used for a single codec configuration. Eventhough the question is still open, the feedback received so far seem to indicate that people agree to that.

We have also discussed whether it should, within a BUNDLE group, be allowed to use the same PT value in multiple m- lines - if used for the same codec configuration. I will now put forward a question on that :)


Q7: Within a BUNDLE group, do we allow the usage of the same PT value in multiple RTP m- lines, for the SAME codec configuration?

Note: This of course prevents the mapping to m- line purely based on PT, and based on the outcome of that discussion we may have to add restrictions on when the same PT value can be used etc. But, this question is whether we generally want to allow the usage of the same PT value in multiple m- lines :)

Regards,

Christer