Re: [MMUSIC] ice-options attribute: session- and media-level?

Peter,

On 6/19/18 3:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 6/19/18 12:38 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The draft defines the ice-options SDP attribute, so the draft needs to define what type (media and/or session) of SDP attribute it is.
> 
> At the syntax level, yes. Sematically, however, is it perhaps the job of
> the ICE specification to define whether ICE extensions (however encoded
> in a using protocol) are session-level or media-level?

whether session level, media level, or both is required as part of the 
registration of the attribute. It is considered part of the syntax even 
though it isn't part of the ABNF.

Of course the semantics of its use is also tied up in whether it is 
session or media level, and so needs to be described as part of the 
semantics as well.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Peter
> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christer
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 19 Jun 2018, at 21.31, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/16/18 1:20 AM, Suhas Nandakumar wrote:
>>>> Hello All
>>>>
>>>>    Circling back on this topic in making ice-options to be solely Session
>>>> Level and given the majority of responses favored Session level, I can
>>>> make changes in ice-sip-sdp to reflect the same, unless i hear arguments
>>>> otherwise.
>>>
>>> I agree with the direction, but is draft-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp the right
>>> place for this, given that ICE options can be used outside of SIP/SDP?
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 