[MMUSIC] IANA section review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-10

Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com> Thu, 19 November 2015 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bo.burman@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EEC1B2BDD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:57:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cEauJc4RUCUx for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:56:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F13A1B2BD6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 07:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79626d000004282-1b-564df1467f7d
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.27]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DC.5E.17026.641FD465; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:56:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB105.ericsson.se ([169.254.5.237]) by ESESSHC003.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:56:53 +0100
From: Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic (mmusic@ietf.org)" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IANA section review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-10
Thread-Index: AdER39GEQ6GkoPCdTWq1M5wLNKBI3Q==
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:56:53 +0000
Message-ID: <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22E88369D@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.18]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22E88369DESESSMB105erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7tK7bR98wg8YdfBZTlz9mcWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxuM7W9gKPntULN8X28D4w66LkZNDQsBE4vTkdWwQtpjEhXvr gWwuDiGBw4wSn/dMYYZwljBK3P/ZD1bFJqAhMX/HXUYQW0TAQGL2yhlgtrCAu0TDi1fsEHEf icln/jJD2HoSa240sIDYLAKqEv8ufQazeQV8Jdb+WM8EYjMKyErc/34PLM4sIC5x68l8JoiL BCSW7DnPDGGLSrx8/I8VwlaU+PhqHyNEfb7E5suf2SFmCkqcnPmEZQKj0Cwko2YhKZuFpAwi riOxYPcnNghbW2LZwtfMMPaZA4+ZkMUXMLKvYhQtTi0uzk03MtZLLcpMLi7Oz9PLSy3ZxAiM iYNbfuvuYFz92vEQowAHoxIP7wcm3zAh1sSy4srcQ4wSHMxKIry/ngGFeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pz UosPMUpzsCiJ87YwPQgVEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CyTJxcEo1ME5j/tuXwfS4d5tpx5sJvDWiIewJ QRlT9qb2Nz/f7b1v3br326cLnNRJmb6MZ//hvOjfq/IFfpyYO+XT8kfXbV87zbDevCCjwIHf U9PfSDxAbeO/yn17SrbKrJS68+bfC5F3Sh2Wew9OS+57y7SMJ2nfb7a/oqzmvgWpbROFf+45 JXP20T05Zz8lluKMREMt5qLiRACsvNNthQIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/U1UD8gfHOpb7xJTDQFFelZnSkVE>
Subject: [MMUSIC] IANA section review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-10
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:57:00 -0000

I have reviewed the IANA section (15) of this draft and have the following comments:

In section 5.47; "alt-group" is inconsistent with IANA table, where it is defined as session level.

In section 5.54; "T38FaxMaxIFP", "T38FaxUdpECDepth", "T38UdpFECMaxSpan", and "T38ModemType" are all inconsistent with IANA, where they are defined as media level.

In section 9.1; Editorial: missing ":" in "ssrc-groupFEC-FR"

In section 15.1; suggest clarifying what it means to "indicate the applicability" of a newly defined multiplexing category value to various sub-registries is detailed a bit more, e.g. that such new multiplexing category can replace the assigned category defined in this document, if that is the intent, and in that case what it means (e.g. for interoperability) to change the category for an attribute.

In section 15.2.2; "rtsp-ice-d-m" is not discussed anywhere else in the document; should it be?

In section 15.2.3; "qos-mech-send" and "qos-mech-recv" are here both listed as NORMAL, which is inconsistent with the categorization TRANSPORT in section 5.6. The current table ends with "calgextmap", but the IANA table continues with "phone-context", "clir", "Q763-nature", "Q763-plan", "Q763-INN", "require", "record", and "recordpref", some of which refer quite old RFCs. Why are those not included in the table?

In section 15.2.4; "codecConfig" is inconsistent with IANA value that does not use a capital C in the middle: "codecconfig". The IANA table now also has "predefined_ROI", which should then be added.

In section 15.2.7; "DDP" is listed here, but is not mentioned or motivated in section 8.5, which would be reasonable considering that "DUP" is discussed in section 8.6.

In section 15.2.8; What does it really mean when "rtcp-fb" attribute as such is defined as IDENTICAL-PER-PT, but a certain parameter (here "app") is assigned another category (here "SPECIAL")? Does the parameter override the attribute-wide default? Is this principle described somewhere? The IANA table now also contains "3gpp-roi-arbitrary" and "3gpp-roi-predefined", which should then be added.

In section 15.2.9; Same comment regarding override as for 15.2.8, for both "app" and "ecn" values.

In section 15.2.14; IANA table now also contains "pause", which should then be added.

In section 15.2.16; Editorial: Table heading "QoS Mechanism" seems to be copy-pasted from 15.2.15, but should probably instead be "Value Name" or something similar.

In section 15.2.17; The names listed in the table are not mentioned or motivated in section 5.16 - should they be?

In section 15.2.18; Same comment as for section 15.2.17.

Cheers,
Bo