IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-36.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 03 July 2019 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01CD120278 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zApRC_ZdZHhs for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (outgoing-alum.mit.edu [18.7.68.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19BB120250 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PaulKyzivatsMBP.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x63G9MOM010987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 12:09:23 -0400
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <156087807004.8279.17078588069758754087@ietfa.amsl.com> <02033a89739d6390b818f10be9a92ebd8f0f05cb.camel@ericsson.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <f96ac51c-29c9-c96e-0ad0-7d68d6fcb216@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 12:09:22 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <02033a89739d6390b818f10be9a92ebd8f0f05cb.camel@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/Vnlqv_k6m9WRlo3MQgFjESp_n4o>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-36.txt
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 16:09:31 -0000

On 7/3/19 11:28 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Paul asked me to review this latest version with especiall focus from
> an RTSP perspective. I have reviewed the diff against RFC4566 as well
> as the -35 and I don't find anything that appears to upset an RTSP
> usage of SDP. I think RTSP 2.0 Appendix D is providing the necessary
> special context usage rules, similar to how O/A tells you how to
> interpret SDP in that context.

Thank you Magnus!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email