IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-09 Submitted

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Fri, 22 July 2016 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C02A12D5D0 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13nMWByBFI7M for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x230.google.com (mail-yw0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C35B12D63F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x230.google.com with SMTP id j12so89790601ywb.2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6WyV0qhMXoTWsr9Awf1Y+a3aVYTUeWgaB+ksUBLGiEM=; b=kgvQ53HrrPzNQ9xLYYQZmTNGXXsKO/L+XLo9knLcyfZF1a4dqJtsqPolQKck2tKDMR MvsCpMvLc9e+4mH8QroAE1XRE1oHgvKQaCKaxoP1yWpI+72w1oQtVns6i74hcZ67/aIe yy3dRtRp0UBdTlXEVXD7akwDUqV948J3cYKlwKYll555sXYK4bVYcWQFJZa8nDjrwu+I LXPEiKFOPEHNJVbo9FNyuVVqE5la/QcfPLDuvm68I2RUOLUwPORE82xT73GDub26xhKh XoGprXA8kIeG0S2u1Zv51Aut5jGM41AyYj+X7QMujfXUNYnZJjcn0gPLqdFKDnqDVQI8 ZwRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6WyV0qhMXoTWsr9Awf1Y+a3aVYTUeWgaB+ksUBLGiEM=; b=J8+hMBYJELuAZbkISKEJ+hNjEowqWcBZ3Tw1cnHvgNJRMqtzGKdICUa+Jz2tXvmolz ugFnMOr/D5SXhPdHA+7I3cbB4Z+M8oGSjuvxRvOnx3tEFE8uyilLZQ7gGsovM36afVd4 ry/YdS+RZviPXXPkzyNPBU8k62U9AXrRjvYGQY9SrTI86Mu8MOHcnKTP9lXQfxjNNfI6 bdMCLCYGNqZLVN4K2GIOvGaYKg+fsuoBwYCd5Iqzmy4A6VM105QHAHdCctVB5a6lm1J4 Q6TzX6HMV+3kyizmwEXGfrmQjJAs/wYMj+vl5lTP+NcCXzqF1m1T4qedrFkziyzILVlc UGzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv8PP9g4TanF94xxAmqS3RLBK5tns8GHnBpV3kyew52XmK13GOkbI6O39VTgpfOz5NyzxLu8Jjd0W2JYg==
X-Received: by 10.129.156.72 with SMTP id t69mr2083967ywg.295.1469174530473; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.121.3 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D3AD6B68.C004%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <CAMRcRGQqevQt1+Dke6vVFw9ASicZSH+GDFVpnYBMP4zLyzdzRA@mail.gmail.com> <D3AD60CE.BFE8%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <CAMRcRGSbDtvoqbmhHcrEP9anfBU=kG5Mf-gLhHgNBhRufBvynw@mail.gmail.com> <D3AD6B68.C004%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:32:10 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGSOkVyQvM97iomD=-B=W-SLenHf8LpwvrBDMnY9Q+JNBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b77c4008ac1053834da49"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/WBzv56GUaV8NRymSjKYmOA8XN5k>
Cc: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-09 Submitted
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:02:13 -0000

Hello Christer

  I have submitted -10 version to address the above feedback. Please let me
know your thoughts


Thanks
Suhas

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > The draft currently says the following on Offer/Answer usage for the
> ice2 option
> >
> >" The ICE option, 'ice2' is used with the SDP session level "a=ice-
>
> >   options" attribute in an SDP offer to indicate that the initiator of
> >   the ICE exchange is compliant to procedures from [ICE-BIS <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-09#ref-ICE-BIS>] (via
> >   "a=ice-options: ice2").  The Responding Peer includes this same
> >   attribute at the session level in the SDP answer if it is also an
> >   [ICE-BIS <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-09#ref-ICE-BIS>] compliant ICE Agent."
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Are you looking for something more specific than this ?
>
>
> Since chapter 4 describes how offers and answers are created, I assumed it
> should be mentioned there. The text you have is a general description.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Christer Holmberg <
> christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see that you have added the definition of the ice2 ice-option. However,
>> you have not defined usage of it in the offer/answer procedures, and it’s
>> not included in the SDP examples.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Christer
>>
>> From: mmusic <mmusic-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Suhas Nandakumar <
>> suhasietf@gmail.com>
>> Date: Friday 8 July 2016 at 15:58
>> To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-09 Submitted
>>
>> Hello All
>>
>>   We submitted -09 version of the ice-sip-sdp draft with the following
>> changes
>>
>>    1. Added Section 5 for dealing with ice2
>>    2. updated an example in Appendix A to be IPv6 based end-point
>>    3. Updated Section 13.2 to say about the aggregation rules for ice2
>> ice-option
>>    4. Restructured Offer/Answer sections into a single place as can be
>> seen in Section 4
>>
>> Thanks to Christer for feedback on the restructuring the offer/answer
>> sections.
>>
>>
>> We hope that this version incorporates all the outstanding issues. Please
>> let us know if we are missing anything.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Suhas
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email