Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISSION: Full bundle or no bundle

Hey Christer

   This looks good ( including Paul's clarification and Martin's statement
about Expectation of the following fixup to make intermediaries happy).

Also few comments inline.

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

>  Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> At the interim yesterday, we agreed that an answerer MUST always include
> identical ports* (usage of port zero within a bundle is a separate topic)
> for all m- lines within an bundle group. ****
>
> **
>
**
>
> If the answerer wants to use different ports* for some/all m- lines, it
> MUST NOT include those m- lines in a bundle group (if they already are in a
> bundle group, a separate offer is needed to remove them).
>

[Suhas] If the answerer wants to use different ports for "ALL" the m-lines
then it is implicitly assumed that there was a Successful O/A exchange +
Fixup and this Offer is a subsequent one.
On the other hand, changing some ports in the Answer can even happen in the
first ever BUNDLE O/A as well.
Just wanted to clarify with the wordings.

>
>
****
>
> ** **
>
> WHAT IT MEANS: There is no way for an answerer to tell that the offerer,
> for certain m- lines, can use the same port*, eventhough the answer will
> use separate ports*.****
>
> ** **
>
> I will work on some actual text proposal later, but please indicate if you
> OBJECT to this approach in general.****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Christer****
>
> ** **
>
> NOTE: “port” = port:address combination – we are working on coming up with
> better terminology J****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>

Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISSION: Full bundle or no bundle - there aint anything in between