Re: [MMUSIC] IETF#89: BUNDLE: Q9: What are the criteria for allowing usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Sun, 02 March 2014 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7641A0CEE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:18:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9U4ekh94Qs0b for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D2E1A0CC8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:18:10 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f038e000005d01-ae-53132f8fa519
Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 70.0F.23809.F8F23135; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:18:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.216]) by ESESSHC020.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:18:06 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] IETF#89: BUNDLE: Q9: What are the criteria for allowing usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines?
Thread-Index: Ac818yLx23ucJzjaSbubJw5GhjG+ygAB2s0AAAfSnOc=
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:18:05 +0000
Message-ID: <82q8no58hvgf81e3x2o3mnbt.1393766282956@email.android.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1C368D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <CAMRcRGRq5zrZJNBwvPpX-nshqar8vS2u3Kefu91GhoGXTtoJYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMRcRGRq5zrZJNBwvPpX-nshqar8vS2u3Kefu91GhoGXTtoJYA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_82q8no58hvgf81e3x2o3mnbt1393766282956emailandroidcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW6/vnCwwfLDOhZTlz9msdg5t4PZ gclj56y77B5LlvxkCmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MroejidveCIYsX3HT3sDYyLZboYOTkkBEwk fj2+yQxhi0lcuLeerYuRi0NI4BCjxK7985khnMWMEjePd7J2MXJwsAlYSHT/0wZpEBHQkli9 eC4TSJhZQF3i6uIgkLCwQAujxK1XdSCtIgKtjBJT+o8wQdRbSbzc84gdxGYRUJGY33qPEcTm FXCTeP3zHivErkmMEl9mPmEDSXAKBEqcvH0arJkR6Lrvp9aA2cwC4hK3nsxngrhaQGLJnvNQ H4hKvHz8jxWiJkfi+snfTBALBCVOznzCMoFRZBaS9llIymYhKYOIG0i8PzefGcLWlli28DWU rS+x8ctZRmTxBYzsqxjZcxMzc9LLjTYxAqPn4JbfqjsY75wTOcQozcGiJM774a1zkJBAemJJ anZqakFqUXxRaU5q8SFGJg5OqQZGdnupLLura9TnfZzstt8mPEys6mvMzo6/h5m+TD8vurG+ /5Zq4gmDQPM1D1p+iVncip+o0TkxUGTKGyFr86+X8mdPUuzzDVXjEflp4VOuPOuGyib1KQ0W yfFSPkumr5H27j17LdBNJDep4fjSk847PJdKPOS/XbpLnz+OZTNzi+sVG9NHrkpKLMUZiYZa zEXFiQA4U4BQbAIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/cRQJqm6PLCQzZ7RZPxLQqipk_QA
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] IETF#89: BUNDLE: Q9: What are the criteria for allowing usage of the same PT value within multiple m- lines?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 13:18:14 -0000

And, as we don't have any text for a clearly specified codec configuration, the choice is easy :)

Regards,

Christer

Sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia arc S

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> wrote:



+1 on closing this action item

I support either a clearly specified codec configuration definition or something on the lines above

Cheers
Suhas

On Sunday, March 2, 2014, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:
Hi,

One of the open issues we have in BUNDLE, is when it is allowed to use the same PT value within multiple m- lines.

We tried to come up with different criteria, including a “codec configuration” concept, but we never managed to agree on something.

So, in London, I intend to suggest that we simply say: if you offer the same PT value within multiple m- line, make sure you can handle the associated media when it arrives – period (keep in mind that you always indicate what you want to RECEIVE – the remote peer can still ask you to SEND using different PT values).

If you don’t like this, please provide an alternative solution, because I want to close this issue in London. There is no idea to keep “taking the issue back to the list”. We’ve done that for a few meetings already.

Regards,

Christer