[MMUSIC] SDP Mux Attributes - RFC4566bis dependenc (IETF 98 Followup)

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD942129B20 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ibUHDOYv8R5N for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF008129AE6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n21so63018718qka.3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K6KVwPLsXu4LzJl0+EIy3CBEg/FoCUJXydfBto8pS1w=; b=tw4kUfynQBqoGdmwIv8Zklb4FLCyUgR8yqnb9A10QNjLuRLvJxbGCT40bk4JhgOzy5 gpz5mMJtB20xmTFYF74CbJXFpD/c4bM7T56fxCyP4bzzalpEelnqGbeoQsCLkf5Tf/Fb hnPDtgeX7uBZO2/JKZXrwtnED00llW9At4oC3MUZSM/qwpCkTSy4WmYyxg/+4JEyaJOp gGDGHkwQimtNBM2xUIZjL8pZXgf3k8xgzzUSmVx2AA4mfA1EHQasdtuhYemI6np+Mdda CPNlfx5OJM3xU5BuzThRcDGc7y2nynCH9meZM+0+4j0TB13UqdlhMRPxBspg8B6mmoaM ZhVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K6KVwPLsXu4LzJl0+EIy3CBEg/FoCUJXydfBto8pS1w=; b=CX0nQ3hEce+8YrqLzfvGI2HfWlPrltleR1dZKD1u3i5+YfOeq2IAsvO59YX7Ia/tzi 7LgNprvXYQURyUcFMvuswsgNSZH/opAfPVhHC9BIHpfTrKQsDoczfsLeBn4eQnRLdYXo HsWHV5cTp29WOlto77DZtY8Hf3q1wpkFrV4J4qKOPxdZJRx+FyAVwJS+v1EgZFSrM2ha WTA0+51GGc8/qi/MVRjer1cRMAXKu+S7Fgo3e5FSWFPleXtKBGq+5d2icwIBHGDZizd7 i/mXNbz/Cq1P9R/Ago1b1Gk5zcAh3tQneGNFozkewspMBSG/IzkUtbuOx/8JGkFtPvNZ F7IQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJNVgYMjdEdj+S5keSNH0Fnn1SlsjMlquPlEu9t7mdLAucfKduuq4vLRQJhaMupFd7SIGJ3XLgmCn7L0g==
X-Received: by 10.55.31.2 with SMTP id f2mr1906030qkf.5.1481821071084; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.50.36 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 08:57:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGTaKS5FeR4QL2STk6BbVfgU3eQh46T_-jyfPkmWu8PJ8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147ee149016b90543b55a82"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/g8buUkyAZvDyt2zUSgD7sNNYbUs>
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: [MMUSIC] SDP Mux Attributes - RFC4566bis dependenc (IETF 98 Followup)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:57:55 -0000

Hello All
 At the IETF98 meeting there was a discussion on DOWNRef'ing the RFC4566bis
dependency on the SDP Attributes Mux draft.
However Ben suggested following changes that would help us move RFC455bis
as Informational Dependency rather than normative one ( as it is today)
Please let us know if we all agree on the same so that I can submit an
updated version
<excerpt>
The offending text is from section 15.2:
" Any future updates to the "Mux Category" column values needs to follow
the existing registration policy of the affected table (Section 8.2.4.2 of
[I-D.ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis]).
Also, the procedures from Section 8.2.4.1 of
[I-D.ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis] needs to be followed when assigning "Mux
Category" value for the newly defined SDP attributes."
Proposed Text:
"The registration policy for updates to the 'Mux Category' column values
for existing parameters, or when registering new parameters,are beyond the
scope of this document. The registration policy  for the affected table is
defined in [I-D.ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis]"
</excerpt>

Thanks
Suhas