IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-01.txt

"Parthasarathi R" <partha@parthasarathi.co.in> Mon, 27 May 2013 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299AB21F9677 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.765
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.765 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, J_CHICKENPOX_62=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_63=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HxxZmIcTqS3U for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mailhostbox.com (outbound-us2.mailhostbox.com [69.93.141.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4CD21F9691 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 09:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userPC (unknown [122.179.80.84]) (Authenticated sender: partha@parthasarathi.co.in) by smtp.mailhostbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DE3E6480AF; Mon, 27 May 2013 16:19:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=parthasarathi.co.in; s=20120823; t=1369671590; bh=fQlzDTo7TUYN1pXtD/Ebh9bFbjEszBdhEod7LFW2NJM=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=c6LczVcr1X2nKsXE4mfPXb2hN3ne8e139majQo0fHRWwS1aKQKedLigOuT58mSoq9 lepTmz7VTVrPSGgoEVLB7lcuhi5thDivbOLtWGcAQ5svyZEl9o5MmfEP23G2NQ9Yzk uR61mqQyeysh1Oa70DquhMxq4j6yWvZEWJC/IvDs=
From: Parthasarathi R <partha@parthasarathi.co.in>
To: 'Ari Keränen' <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729@tools.ietf.org
References: <20130520161935.17435.91264.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A28FCC.9010401@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51A28FCC.9010401@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:49:41 +0530
Message-ID: <001501ce5af6$01c845c0$0558d140$@co.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac5aYlKiUuvBD7tQQCOj8p8Nq+AjeQAk0EAw
Content-Language: en-us
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0209.51A387A6.0025, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-CTCH-SenderID: partha@parthasarathi.co.in
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalMessages: 1
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSpam: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalSuspected: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalBulk: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalConfirmed: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalRecipients: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-TotalVirus: 0
X-CTCH-SenderID-BlueWhiteFlag: 0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 70.87.28.142
Cc: 'mmusic' <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:19:55 -0000

Ari,

Thank for your comments. We'll incorporate all the comments in the next
revision.

Thanks
Partha

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Ari Keränen
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 4:12 AM
> To: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: mmusic
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-g723-g729-
> 01.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There seems to be one (recurring) typo in the examples:
> 
> 4.1.  Offer with G279 annexb=yes and answer with G279 annexb=no
> 
>             [Offer with G279 annexb=yes]
> 
> s/G279/G729/g
> (same in the sections 4.2 & 4.3)
> 
> 
> Also, the following sentence in section 3 seems a bit hard to parse:
> 
>     Based on the above, it is best to not use comfort noise frames if
> the
>     SDP offer or answer indicates no support for it.
> 
> Maybe rather say "[...] offer or answer indicates that comfort noise is
> not supported", if that's what you mean.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Ari
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email