[MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 09 August 2019 18:38 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7991200EC; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, fandreas@cisco.com, mmusic@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <156537593203.15838.12286824910808417510.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:38:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/jMkeoxmk475VO2Lgmt6IQWB8B3o>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:39:03 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-38: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A fairly minor point, but the example in Section 5.6 is not compliant with the ABNF for the ice-options production, which uses SP to separate different ice-option-tag values; the example uses a comma. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for addressing most of my comments from the -37! A few still remain, below. Can you remind me why the discussion of an additional three-second waiting period for SIP with forking was removed from (now-) Section 7? Do we have anywhere a definition of what it means to "indicate ICE support in an SDP offer/answer"? (As distinct from ice2 support.) I remember some discussion about containing a ufrag/password being enough, but that doesn't seem to have ended up in the document. Section 4.2.2 Aren't "rtcp attribute SHOULD be included" and "rtcp attribute MAY be omitted" just duplicating existing normative requirements from previous specifications (which thus would not need new normative language here)? I think we talked about how this is slightly different from some of the previous relevant specifications, so calling out any differences here might be worthwhile. Section 5.1 I appreciate that IP address privacy is mentioned here. (It might be good in the security considerations, too.) Section 9 I think this top-level section would be a great place to reiterate that the SDP and ICE security considerations apply, since we are using both of them in combination. Specifically, the IP Address Privacy concerns are only briefly mentioned elsewhere in the document, and could be worth reiterating.
- [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-m… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Adam Roach
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ie… Suhas Nandakumar