[MMUSIC] RE : IPv6 transition and ICE (Multicast use case)

<mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 21 April 2010 17:59 UTC

From: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, 'Hadriel Kaplan' <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:54:21 +0200
Thread-Topic: RE : [MMUSIC] IPv6 transition and ICE (Multicast use case)
Thread-Index: AQHK4XusZLv7XpPX2k6XJVuGmM9lRg==
Message-ID: <3218_1271872462_4BCF3BCE_3218_64752_1_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F30F0107DA75@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] RE : IPv6 transition and ICE (Multicast use case)
Precedence: list

Dear all,

Another use case for ALTC is described in: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-venaas-behave-v4v6mc-framework-01

"
The line of interest here is "c=IN IP4 224.2.17.12/127". It is legal
to use a domain name, this line would then become e.g. "c=IN IP4
mcast.example.com/127". The problem here is that the application is
told to use IPv4. It will expect the name to resolve to an IPv4
address, and may ignore any IPv6 replies. One could argue that it
would be incorrect to use IPv6, since IPv4 is specified. For DNS to
solve our problem, we would need a new IP neutral SDP syntax, and
applications would need to be updated to support it.

An alternative to rewriting addresses in the network is to make the
applications aware of the translation and mappings in use. One
approach could be for the source to create say SDP that includes both
the original and the translated addresses. This may require use of
techniques like CCAP [I-D.boucadair-mmusic-ccap] for specifying both
IPv4 and IPv6 multicast addresses, allowing the receiver to choose
which one to use. The other alternative would be for the receiving
application to be aware of the translation and the mapping in use.
This means that the receiving application can receive the original
SDP, but then apply the mapping to those addresses..
"

As for the previously mentioned use cases (previous emails), this scenario does not require connectivity checks (at least for scalability issues at the source level).

Cheers,
Med

*********************************
This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited.
Messages are susceptible to alteration.
France Telecom Group shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it immediately and inform the sender.
********************************

[MMUSIC] RE : IPv6 transition and ICE (Multicast … mohamed.boucadair