Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request spam
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 27 April 2013 03:07 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AEC21F9D3D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gidYN3gK3t9m for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6070A21F9A06 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id s47so3232352wey.8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XGUs949fjmOcflqTqx1weuYPY36fAl9DTnt9SaUf+NI=; b=bKHBgW2234SX5UXfYx0gxLe7TdUrIBhhqYdDKaJ47rvmQ3y1KXIyuutItXd5XgMUsA OOXCEsQ77baNvdS2eo/Sfihqa8zHgRYxvcfkgUa50kxfgWXhsvQjHvWF9tNO3AbhsLLe b8kS3HNEFjTYSc8s+6m82NtzQFfWWNIwRQMXOSoc67yAZ3/q16a97kdTjbkZceQBefVa cJrhTHJKykKHzHXj97fnAWTE5j0VDU78Larz+ezLJt8uTLzHrZDaiLnPZRHZRX66wmGt BHEk8TSop8BtQ+QDYSu93ZeSlXoxtqo02qfY1SldRrBAULnZzuGgdaLm/NCU0rdClea3 3tYg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.198.49 with SMTP id iz17mr7268500wic.19.1367032071451; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.33.102 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BLU169-W12326CA72DA6BE4060E9E3293B70@phx.gbl>
References: <CAMRcRGSsvFeWEeSwii_1b+VrD=m6bNezoMsY6_gKh0B1RoafSw@mail.gmail.com> <BLU169-W12326CA72DA6BE4060E9E3293B70@phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:07:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW+tn+YEFvw2Wu+MRg2s1k1f1jtoSXFojmn2at3jVaD6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request spam
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:07:53 -0000
On 26 April 2013 14:33, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote: > Let me suggest that you do not need to send individual review requests for > every section in the document. Yeah, the volume on this list was approaching it, but it just went past "tl;dr".
- [MMUSIC] Review Request - draft-nandakumar-mmusic… Suhas Nandakumar
- Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request spam Bernard Aboba
- Re: [MMUSIC] Review Request spam Martin Thomson