IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5576 is da answah

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Mon, 26 November 2012 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6490721F85C2 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:02:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C8csO6ZKGDCe for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blu0-omc1-s6.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc1-s6.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EE721F85B4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLU002-W234 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s6.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:02:50 -0800
Message-ID: <BLU002-W234F49853B018A50613608B935F0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_6f0d5894-eda6-4812-9f23-1250a284bed1_"
X-Originating-IP: [24.16.96.166]
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:02:50 -0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <50B31DD5.7070302@alvestrand.no>
References: <BLU002-W21780C8EDF047E1811F270D93540@phx.gbl>, , , <265A48F7-9330-4415-9BF9-CAA29FE12BAE@vidyo.com>, , , <50AD0BCB.9090508@alum.mit.edu>, , <BLU002-W158A3D7EDFBFADEA151D8E935B0@phx.gbl>, , <50AE1D75.1070100@alvestrand.no>, , <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B0428C4@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <BLU002-W568799D8C49E68A19F7DE0935B0@phx.gbl>, <50B31DD5.7070302@alvestrand.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Nov 2012 08:02:50.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E027280:01CDCBAC]
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] RFC 5576 is da answah
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 08:02:52 -0000

Harald said:


    "So are you arguing that draft-lennox should specify "imageattr" with
    the "a=ssrc" construct as well as with the "a=remote-ssrc"
    construct? I could support that.

    

    Sender's generic support can be indicated using 6236, but the sender
    might want to specify it per stream too."

[BA] Yes.  There are situations in which per-stream information would be useful (e.g. if the cameras do not have the same capabilities).  Including a=ssrc and a=remote-ssrc in both the Offer and the Answer, along with parameters from RFC 6236, it seems to me that it would be possible to negotiate per-stream parameters in a single O/A exchange in many situations.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email