[MMUSIC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14: (with COMMENT)

"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 26 October 2016 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D108512940F; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.36.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147747540682.18851.267971327825992233.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:50:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/o_wJPhggsNLLgS41Kej-Tb3xfOQ>
Cc: mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:50:07 -0000

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


- 4.5 and 5.7: What if the different a=crypto lines
specify different strength ciphersuites? Wouldn't it be
better to pick the strongest or to say they MUST be the
same (as is done in 5.35)? If picking the first is the
right answer then maybe warn folks to not put a stronger
ciphersuite anywhere else?

- 5.36 vs. 5.39: It wasn't clear to me why these have
different rules - can you explain?