Re: [MMUSIC] Brian Haberman's No Objection on charter-ietf-mmusic-03-00: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 03 February 2016 17:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594CA1B3541; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:21:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2TgnIyovNeg; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:21:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F351B3540; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 09:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u13HLTVn027017 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:21:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.10]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:21:29 -0600
Message-ID: <F0E90FAA-9E24-4857-98A6-4A0B3061DECF@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160203152115.2958.57905.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160203152115.2958.57905.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5213)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/wZN-ThQhMK_y3oIoaJ8swm39-m0>
Cc: mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Brian Haberman's No Objection on charter-ietf-mmusic-03-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:21:33 -0000
On 3 Feb 2016, at 9:21, Brian Haberman wrote: > Was any thought given to advancing the base specifications to Internet > Standard? Not really. This was mainly a restructuring of existing work. Advancing to internet-standard is worth discussion, but I think it would be better left for a separate charter exercise. (The dependency map for this stuff in pretty crazy.) Ben.
- [MMUSIC] Brian Haberman's No Objection on charter… Brian Haberman
- Re: [MMUSIC] Brian Haberman's No Objection on cha… Ben Campbell