IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] The MMUSIC WG has placed draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Tue, 09 May 2017 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5A412EAA5 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPxPLuLTFyGX for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 10:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20681129511 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 10:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2061; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494351341; x=1495560941; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=fvrhnUlT1y7o8Aew3JQvU2V/6FuZ+GqhCe2vgT9gQGU=; b=j/8dxkU8Cg3KgRbPPYxxCrn68RRSyKDk/P43hQzIeTm/2BhKxi2ie98R paSPpp1rENEoj4O/J1lxHchql8Y3LttE+ahS/I8x2Y4c0HFZsh0UILRHP 7JFTj/9XZEpzi+QpzkqzWGff6QNDt6yUetYH2EVFWLoZuYLXQnXFurqA9 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C6AAC3/BFZ/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1VigQwHjXqRNSGVcoIPIQ2FLEoChGw/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRUBAQEBAgEBARsdNAsFCwIBCBgeBQsnCyUCBA4FigkDDQgOtROHKwiDPQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFhl+BXisLgmWEPySDOIIxBZ4FAYcbgQOKeoIEj2eUPwEfOIEKcBVGEgGFFoFKdoY3gTCBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,315,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="243186368"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 May 2017 17:35:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (xch-aln-008.cisco.com [173.36.7.18]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v49HZddG003014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 May 2017 17:35:39 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 9 May 2017 12:35:39 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 9 May 2017 12:35:39 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net>
CC: "mmusic (E-mail)" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] The MMUSIC WG has placed draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHSyNZ5p+Z17tlesUCxfMRqW+zzXqHskTMAgAAEUgCAAAH3AA==
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 17:35:39 +0000
Message-ID: <DB7AE890-0700-4962-90D2-7D7AF7377A6B@cisco.com>
References: <149432306204.23888.7508271969686658364.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <aa333fe5-6c2f-560c-de0f-4d64b23bf783@comcast.net> <E10F1341-5218-47E1-89D7-1CBC2C66B561@cisco.com> <66434d8c-1e4f-c401-c5ba-83eada18d372@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <66434d8c-1e4f-c401-c5ba-83eada18d372@comcast.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.212.167]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BDBA79EE75A83843A42FA73601A0F819@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/wov2yErrgtUZURyRyVuVZ6K-nLI>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] The MMUSIC WG has placed draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 17:35:43 -0000

> On May 9, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> On 5/9/17 1:13 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei) wrote:
>> SIPBRANDY WG is not chartered to produce PS specs, which the original draft (draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp) would have been since it was updating a current PS. The WG made the decision (vetted by AD and IESG) to not re-charter and instead decided split off the piece that updates a PS into a new PS (draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation).
> 
> OK. But then couldn't everything be put into the MMUSIC document?
> ISTM that given the limited content in these documents that splitting it into two, with a lot of overlap, is confusing.

I see your point but Currently SIPBRANDY is chartered to produce Opportunistic SRTP as a BCP. There is also a milestone to inform MMUSIC or other appropriate WGs of any changes needed to support Opportunistic SRTP (Not expected to be published as an RFC).  I think SIPBRANDY is just carrying out what they are chartered to do.

-G

> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> 
>> -G
>> 
>>> On May 9, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Paul Kyzivat <paul.kyzivat@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 5/9/17 5:44 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> The MMUSIC WG has placed draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in
>>>> state
>>>> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Bo Burman)
>>>> 
>>>> The document is available at
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Comment:
>>>> Based on the feedback we received at the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago, it
>>>> seems there is strong consensus for adopting this draft in MMUSIC.
>>> 
>>> I don't understand why both this draft and draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp are needed. Wouldn't one draft do?
>>> 
>>> 	Thanks,
>>> 	Paul
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmusic mailing list
>>> mmusic@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>> 
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email